Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/axgbe: support sfp module EEPROM

[Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>]

On 1/12/2021 5:28 AM, asomalap@amd.com wrote:
> From: Amaranath Somalapuram <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com>
> 
> Adding API for get_module_eeprom and get_module_info.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amaranath Somalapuram <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com>
> ---
>   doc/guides/nics/features/axgbe.ini |   1 +
>   drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c   |   2 +
>   drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy.h      |   4 +
>   drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy_impl.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   4 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/features/axgbe.ini b/doc/guides/nics/features/axgbe.ini
> index 34df0d1ee..3a090183e 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/nics/features/axgbe.ini
> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/features/axgbe.ini
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ CRC offload          = Y
>   L3 checksum offload  = Y
>   L4 checksum offload  = Y
>   Basic stats          = Y
> +Module EEPROM dump   = Y
>   Linux UIO            = Y
>   x86-32               = Y
>   x86-64               = Y
> diff --git a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c
> index cfe6aba73..22e05e8cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c
> @@ -257,6 +257,8 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops axgbe_eth_dev_ops = {
>   	.timesync_adjust_time         = axgbe_timesync_adjust_time,
>   	.timesync_read_time           = axgbe_timesync_read_time,
>   	.timesync_write_time          = axgbe_timesync_write_time,
> +	.get_module_info              = axgbe_get_module_info,
> +	.get_module_eeprom            = axgbe_get_module_eeprom,
>   };
>   
>   static int axgbe_phy_reset(struct axgbe_port *pdata)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy.h b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy.h
> index 77ee20a31..d9d7fde41 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy.h
> @@ -188,5 +188,9 @@
>   #define DUPLEX_FULL             0x01
>   #define DUPLEX_UNKNOWN          0xff
>   
> +int axgbe_get_module_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> +				struct rte_eth_dev_module_info *modinfo);
> +int axgbe_get_module_eeprom(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> +				  struct rte_dev_eeprom_info *info);
>   #endif
>   /* PHY */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy_impl.c b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy_impl.c
> index 02236ec19..e60f51ede 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy_impl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy_impl.c
> @@ -141,12 +141,18 @@ enum axgbe_sfp_speed {
>   
>   #define AXGBE_SFP_EXTD_CC			31
>   
> +#define AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE		256
> +
>   struct axgbe_sfp_eeprom {
>   	u8 base[64];
>   	u8 extd[32];
>   	u8 vendor[32];
>   };
>   
> +struct axgbe_sfp_eeprom_module {
> +	u8 base[AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE];
> +};
> +
>   #define AXGBE_BEL_FUSE_VENDOR	"BEL-FUSE"
>   #define AXGBE_BEL_FUSE_PARTNO	"1GBT-SFP06"
>   
> @@ -734,6 +740,114 @@ static int axgbe_phy_sfp_read_eeprom(struct axgbe_port *pdata)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> +int axgbe_get_module_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> +				struct rte_eth_dev_module_info *modinfo)
> +{
> +	struct axgbe_port *pdata = dev->data->dev_private;
> +	struct axgbe_sfp_eeprom sfp_eeprom;
> +	uint8_t eeprom_addr;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = axgbe_phy_get_comm_ownership(pdata);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	ret = axgbe_phy_sfp_get_mux(pdata);
> +
> +	if (ret) {
> +		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "I2C error setting SFP MUX\n");
> +		goto put;
> +	}
> +
> +	eeprom_addr = 0;
> +	ret = axgbe_phy_i2c_read(pdata, AXGBE_SFP_SERIAL_ID_ADDRESS,
> +			&eeprom_addr, sizeof(eeprom_addr),
> +			 &sfp_eeprom, sizeof(sfp_eeprom));
> +
> +	if (ret) {
> +		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "I2C error reading SFP EEPROM\n");
> +		goto put;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (sfp_eeprom.extd[AXGBE_SFP_EXTD_SFF_8472] != 0xff) {
> +		if (sfp_eeprom.extd[AXGBE_SFP_EXTD_SFF_8472] == 0) {
> +			modinfo->type = RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079;
> +			modinfo->eeprom_len = RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079_LEN;
> +		} else {
> +			ret = -EIO;
> +			goto put;
> +		}
> +	}

The issue mentioned is still valid, can you please check comment in the previous 
version(s).

> +
> +put:
> +	axgbe_phy_sfp_put_mux(pdata);
> +	axgbe_phy_put_comm_ownership(pdata);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int axgbe_get_module_eeprom(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> +				struct rte_dev_eeprom_info *info)
> +{
> +	struct axgbe_port *pdata = dev->data->dev_private;
> +	struct axgbe_sfp_eeprom_module sfp_eeprom;
> +	uint8_t eeprom_addr;
> +	uint8_t *data;
> +	uint32_t i;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!info || !info->length || !info->data) {
> +		axgbe_phy_put_comm_ownership(pdata);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = axgbe_phy_get_comm_ownership(pdata);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	ret = axgbe_phy_sfp_get_mux(pdata);
> +
> +	if (ret) {
> +		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "I2C error setting SFP MUX\n");
> +		goto put;
> +	}
> +
> +	eeprom_addr = 0;
> +	ret = axgbe_phy_i2c_read(pdata, AXGBE_SFP_SERIAL_ID_ADDRESS,
> +			&eeprom_addr, sizeof(eeprom_addr),
> +			&sfp_eeprom, sizeof(sfp_eeprom));
> +
> +	if (ret) {
> +		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "I2C error reading SFP EEPROM\n");
> +		goto put;
> +	}
> +
> +	data = info->data;
> +
> +	/* for AXGBE_SFP_SERIAL_ID_ADDRESS */
> +	if (info->length > AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE)
> +		for (i = 0; i < AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE; i++)
> +			data[i] = sfp_eeprom.base[i];
> +
> +	eeprom_addr = 0;
> +	ret = axgbe_phy_i2c_read(pdata, AXGBE_SFP_DIAG_INFO_ADDRESS,
> +			&eeprom_addr, sizeof(eeprom_addr),
> +			&sfp_eeprom, sizeof(sfp_eeprom));
> +
> +	/* for AXGBE_SFP_DIAG_INFO_ADDRESS */
> +	if (info->length > AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE)
> +		for (i = 0; i < info->length - AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE; i++)
> +			data[i + AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE] =
> +							sfp_eeprom.base[i];

The second page can be written partially, isn't this a problem?

> +
> +put:
> +	axgbe_phy_sfp_put_mux(pdata);
> +	axgbe_phy_put_comm_ownership(pdata);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
>   static void axgbe_phy_sfp_signals(struct axgbe_port *pdata)
>   {
>   	struct axgbe_phy_data *phy_data = pdata->phy_data;
>