DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] lib: include rte_memory.h for __rte_cache_aligned
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:36:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30845403.kPBAiWVWY3@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141211002838.GA24240@localhost.localdomain>

Hi Neil,

2014-12-10 19:28, Neil Horman:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 07:09:03PM +0000, Jia Yu wrote:
> > Hi Neil,
> > 
> > Moving __rte_cache_aligned right after struct keyword will help. On the
> > other hand, enforcing this rule for existing (100+) and future definitions
> > will be difficult. It¹s clearer and a good practice to include header file
> > explicitly.
> > 
> You need to include the header file regardless of what you do.  The advantage to
> placing the macro right after the struct keyword is that failure to include the
> header will result in a compiler error, rather than silent behavioral changes
> and run time breakage.
> 
> You don't have to enforce putting the attribute after the struct keyword, I'd
> say just move them now to protect the current code.  Subsequent patch authors
> will see the existing style and follow suit.  Or they won't, and we'll point out
> the issue during review.

It should be a different patch for next release cycle.
Let's apply this fix only for 1.8.0.

-- 
Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-11  0:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-07 17:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Jia Yu
2014-11-10  9:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-17 19:07   ` Jia Yu
2014-12-08 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] " Neil Horman
2014-12-09  8:53   ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-09  9:11     ` Jia Yu
2014-12-09 15:22     ` Neil Horman
2014-12-10 19:09       ` Jia Yu
2014-12-11  0:28         ` Neil Horman
2014-12-11  0:36           ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2014-12-11 14:17             ` Neil Horman
2014-12-11 21:14               ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-11  0:51       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30845403.kPBAiWVWY3@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).