From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Elena Agostini <eagostini@nvidia.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpudev: manage NULL pointer
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 12:23:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3103480.BfGS6plSxf@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211122182423.5581-1-eagostini@nvidia.com>
22/11/2021 19:24, eagostini@nvidia.com:
> From: Elena Agostini <eagostini@nvidia.com>
>
> gpudev free and unregister functions return gracefully if input pointer is NULL
We could add that the API doc was indicating NULL as a no-op accepted value.
Another explanation to add: cuda driver checks are removed because redundant
with the checks added in gpudev library.
> Fixes: 818a067baf90 ("gpudev: manage NULL pointer")
It should be:
Fixes: e818c4e2bf50 ("gpudev: add memory API")
>
> Signed-off-by: Elena Agostini <eagostini@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/cuda/cuda.c | 6 ------
> lib/gpudev/gpudev.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
[...]
> --- a/lib/gpudev/gpudev.c
> +++ b/lib/gpudev/gpudev.c
> @@ -569,6 +569,9 @@ rte_gpu_mem_free(int16_t dev_id, void *ptr)
> {
> struct rte_gpu *dev;
>
> + if (ptr == NULL)
> + return 0;
> +
> dev = gpu_get_by_id(dev_id);
> if (dev == NULL) {
> GPU_LOG(ERR, "free mem for invalid device ID %d", dev_id);
I think we should keep this check first.
> @@ -612,6 +615,9 @@ rte_gpu_mem_unregister(int16_t dev_id, void *ptr)
> {
> struct rte_gpu *dev;
>
> + if (ptr == NULL)
> + return 0;
> +
> dev = gpu_get_by_id(dev_id);
> if (dev == NULL) {
> GPU_LOG(ERR, "unregister mem for invalid device ID %d", dev_id);
Same here.
There is third function where NULL should be accepted: rte_gpu_mem_register
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-22 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-18 19:28 [PATCH v1] gpudev: return EINVAL if invalid input pointer for free and unregister eagostini
2021-11-18 16:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-11-18 16:22 ` Elena Agostini
2021-11-18 20:19 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-11-19 9:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-19 9:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-24 17:24 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-11-24 18:04 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-12-01 21:37 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-12-02 7:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-12-02 12:33 ` Morten Brørup
2021-12-02 13:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-12-02 13:56 ` Morten Brørup
2021-12-03 10:37 ` Morten Brørup
2021-12-08 17:34 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-12-08 18:40 ` Morten Brørup
2021-12-09 19:43 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-12-08 17:27 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-11-19 10:15 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-11-18 20:33 ` [PATCH v2] gpudev: free and unregister return gracefully if input pointer is NULL eagostini
2021-11-22 18:24 ` [PATCH v3] gpudev: manage NULL pointer eagostini
2021-11-22 11:23 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-11-22 11:34 ` Elena Agostini
2021-11-22 11:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-22 23:52 ` [PATCH v4] " eagostini
2021-11-22 23:55 ` [PATCH v5] " eagostini
2021-11-22 16:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-23 0:15 ` [PATCH v6] " eagostini
2021-11-23 0:42 ` [PATCH v7] " eagostini
2021-11-24 8:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3103480.BfGS6plSxf@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=eagostini@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).