DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@nvidia.com>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
	Lior Margalit <lmargalit@nvidia.com>,
	Asaf Penso <asafp@nvidia.com>,
	david.marchand@redhat.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com,
	jerinj@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] config: make max memzones definition configurable
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:55:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3111936.fEcJ0Lxnt5@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+oZiHYdAu8vfLvd@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>

13/02/2023 12:05, Bruce Richardson:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Ophir Munk wrote:
> > In current DPDK the RTE_MAX_MEMZONE definition is unconditionally hard
> > coded as 2560.  For applications requiring different values of this
> > parameter – it is more convenient to set its value as part of the meson
> > command line rather than changing the dpdk source code per application.
> > An example would be of an application that uses the DPDK mempool library
> > which is based on DPDK memzone library.  The application may need to
> > create a number of steering tables, each of which will require its own
> > mempool allocation.
> > This commit adds a meson optional parameter named max_memzones. If not
> > specified - it is set by default to 2560. The hard coded definition of
> > RTE_MAX_MEMZONE is removed. During meson build time the RTE_MAX_MEMZONE
> > can be optionally defined as the value of max_memzones parameter.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > RFC:
> > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20230130092302.376145-1-ophirmu@nvidia.com/
> > 
> >  config/meson.build  | 1 +
> >  config/rte_config.h | 1 -
> >  meson_options.txt   | 2 ++
> >  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

Are we going to move all compilation-defined settings to meson_options.txt?
The direction discussed in recent years was to configure things at runtime,
and stop adding compilation-time settings.

In this case, it is quite easy to add a new function
	void rte_memzone_set_max(int max)
to be called before rte_eal_init().
If not called, the historical default is used.



  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-13 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-12  8:53 Ophir Munk
2023-02-13 11:05 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-02-13 13:55   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2023-02-13 14:52     ` Bruce Richardson
2023-02-13 17:04       ` Ophir Munk
2023-02-21 10:28         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3111936.fEcJ0Lxnt5@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=asafp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=lmargalit@nvidia.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ophirmu@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).