From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com (mail-we0-f170.google.com
 [74.125.82.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4CD30E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  1 Jul 2014 16:26:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so9748712wes.29
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 07:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=yqchRS+kbO3pc7FxD70wOUtiSdrxN1BqGfkSS58bJLU=;
 b=Oz/JuFWCSUCQvIJXxYh7CIO9VNQcer0OLRzXIMu3ShHaSOdK8uoaJ/i3mMATI+1dKl
 drCvvXMNG+ZpOD8G9QXa2KP+U2WkkGbiYsO2dSUwEmA8ZfXXI4pXIq3OBKIpmuHlYj8O
 XeEUhSb2sPjRS+BcCZLEKnKTe4cV4ka4a5slav9+FKewlWibBNqYWTzzLK/7CdujL1iC
 Qsc5sDLMpraBr1Lr7eLhaZW6ceVqTIikl46plvz2mO/LhIvNtgzGWENzby3Y/adPLbvl
 nyIukL/0auKrEHqLMQ3a/XHWDIiJj+NFi+EPSvApqkhgPkip4HpzOuVWog7EDOA5PET+
 FNfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlN2mLFJEO1gSmPtHMDEvXTCrw/aM1j9vO+FBbGjjs4RphMqnKuDHS2hxknUqdUX4fE0cPU
X-Received: by 10.194.79.135 with SMTP id j7mr53842908wjx.56.1404224822410;
 Tue, 01 Jul 2014 07:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fn1sm43873949wib.18.2014.07.01.07.27.00
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 01 Jul 2014 07:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 16:26:54 +0200
Message-ID: <3150469.bhtIeyNexg@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.1 (Linux/3.14.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.1; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <345C63BAECC1AD42A2EC8C63AFFC3ADC273077A5@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1403864324-12022-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com>
 <CA+cr1cojs0sx5s1ohwVcdT6ojQ_7PEwEAqmtCca0LAz_jkvVdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <345C63BAECC1AD42A2EC8C63AFFC3ADC273077A5@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 1/5] bond: new link bonding library
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:26:42 -0000

2014-07-01 14:19, Doherty, Declan:
> Hi Robert, yes I see this could be an issue, although this currently
> shouldn=E2=80=99t cause an issue, as the currently supported bonding =
modes only
> expected to receive data on one slave at any time, if they are being =
used
> as part of a ether channel but when we add further bonding modes are =
which
> receive data on multiple slaves this would definitely be a problem.
>=20
> Thomas, I=E2=80=99ve tested the above changes, is it possible to inte=
grate this
> patch with the patchset for link bonding for the rc3.

No problem.
It will be in.

Thanks Declan & Robert
--=20
Thomas