From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36811A00BE; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 00:00:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B341C0D9; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 00:00:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26351BEA7 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 00:00:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4684F5C016A; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:00:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:00:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= CVQSNywP7PZvzf4X068HlYmzKYurzhZ4TZ/dKw85XkU=; b=DwqjbycRlu6mN3S1 /4CzC8nTpA5V8MQxc0upHgtQF5CWAjKlEfKVjyYJ2dIQXJY+A2NbVIS3ffLJbVbt Ws7VeuoKsHF/o6e/plwMxFh6si4HTC9+Ej4xLfV4FEDpSYVyP00ciFaM76fgL4/w 3bm/btj4Tmmj1VDZybdTXs5vkP6ZqhPCChDq1SF5LdcZCPoyXQdmvY7ozuOxgzY7 B1JmjYdDe4sVha3ldSU3TPrqjUNIRv0I8B2bj///TNaTBj0u2Rgaj4sO/eHtudGJ 1ugZeWXSA00PZUJIQc7DeqCblre9vVq0aKsj9aLIBWruBLGKga9vwRF2Hkje6bV6 CXf7Wg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=CVQSNywP7PZvzf4X068HlYmzKYurzhZ4TZ/dKw85X kU=; b=TtKyo7EwTFGx4RwP53dWhjuYOzY9jJ/F4iNCQ3W7Vb9Qsb2eVUT+3H3/U lVDjTAjpxwTCD5HMfZkqJeAYGWTX+9tFly5EoHS/bVeCVdW9kffLP1tg64JoQsPF 6HYGfVk5ciyBfKNR4OPZsEV3USrnJWSaDgTn74oA/UhOAuYnJDzL4lP9p+ghluqU YTvgife0wTIelYFp4hhywqQnwApUHusbVpngaJIrgGmYUO5YQDOMQYimfiPTv8IA MdnrxAgvQRMOfs1qkA7aczUWz/0ZBV4zq4DVRctXHcQIHNFzEvu7uP8tqxT0d8Tc sysqfGoOKs0A5BcHQucQYb88jrAGg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudeivddgtdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffdvffejueetleefieeludduuefgteejleevfeekjeefieegheet ffdvkeefgedunecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrd dvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhf rhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EC52E328005A; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:00:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Dmitry Kozlyuk Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Dmitry Malloy , Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile , Fady Bader , Tal Shnaiderman , bruce.richardson@intel.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 00:00:46 +0200 Message-ID: <3159929.Thz7gf2BYr@thomas> In-Reply-To: <2508124.8m6TsFM5Q1@thomas> References: <20200608074153.29611-1-dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com> <20200610142730.31376-1-dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com> <2508124.8m6TsFM5Q1@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 00/11] Windows basic memory management X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 11/06/2020 19:29, Thomas Monjalon: > 10/06/2020 16:27, Dmitry Kozlyuk: > > This patchset implements basic MM with the following features: > > There are some compilation issues on FreeBSD and 32-bit Linux: > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-June/135764.html I did more comments about typos, naming, patch splitting, etc. As soon as these comments are addressed in a v9, I think I can merge. I did not see any public formal approval, but there is no objection, so it looks good to go, and there are a lot of patches in the backlog which depend on this series. Thanks for all your work Dmitry.