From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>,
keith.wiles@intel.com, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Kumara Parameshwaran <kparameshwar@vmware.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/tap: Bug fix to populate fds in secondary process
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 19:33:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3166646.G96rZvMJ2N@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f63698fc-21eb-64b0-94b7-3e605ea725cd@intel.com>
17/01/2022 19:28, Ferruh Yigit:
> > + ret = rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name(request_param->port_name, &port_id);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + TAP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to get port id for %s",
> > + request_param->port_name);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > + dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>
> Since this is not really related with your patch, I want to have a separate thread for it.
>
> It is not good to access the 'rte_eth_devices' global variable directly from a driver, that
> is error prone.
>
> Btw, what 'peer' supposed to contain?
>
> It can be solved by adding an internal API, only for drivers to get eth_dev from the name,
> like: 'rte_eth_dev_get_by_name()'.
> This way a few other usage can be converted to this API.
>
> @Thomas and @Andrew what do you think about the new API proposal?
It looks similar to rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name() which returns a port_id.
It is a bit strange for an ethdev driver to not have access to its own ethdev struct.
Isn't there something broken in the logic?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-26 4:15 Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-17 18:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-18 4:39 ` Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-18 9:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-18 10:52 ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2022-01-18 12:14 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-17 18:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-17 18:33 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2022-01-18 9:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-18 11:21 ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2022-01-18 12:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-18 12:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-01-17 22:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-18 5:22 ` Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-18 16:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-19 4:33 ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2022-01-19 4:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-21 4:29 Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-24 9:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-20 13:38 Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-20 13:26 Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-20 11:12 Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-01-20 15:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-24 9:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 12:25 Kumara Parameshwaran
2021-11-25 12:23 Kumara Parameshwaran
2021-11-25 12:04 Kumara Parameshwaran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3166646.G96rZvMJ2N@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
--cc=kparameshwar@vmware.com \
--cc=kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).