From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A7395CB
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:51:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id p63so32957311wmp.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 07:51:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
 :content-type; bh=9qrtmj0T25juDalGGYOSrhTmh11razvWW6Uygf6mg5U=;
 b=oQyfta/g8zDYENY+Ol7CqFQah8nAX16xLgyv28/FzunU2qBS00ftSdGA/MdRyqpCtK
 8SHHb2vPhhGvvqoAvkIoEbHbx99+KxJbV7ujibiLchRMLfFuNFY8FzXSmgtZkr0FpdF7
 MljPCAuMmxePpyfNeRnvb+39ph8Mu5302MI6LMskfSQugeOngEu+ij4Dt38GQgBFLKmB
 RsH041l461g5DUAAMuJG4CWWLxDNIUx0FXI92DGgqoUCmusmPad6rPrjkWk9MexeXM8q
 ZzY8ZRHwUL6Z77HHZtb1x5IxzIME9+fd/4D5/zFesHYVBjGTysGt/2Q3uHl+XRcOX5Hf
 qZhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=9qrtmj0T25juDalGGYOSrhTmh11razvWW6Uygf6mg5U=;
 b=hHKAVjhTJocc+GCcuqwv8QFT5UJaYCBDr7b1wvZikZAKZLZTA4Yu6IWhd9SE3/43wI
 mMV64+FG6EUtiodhQov5HygvzzzaOrP9nGOxDrR3fhiHV9Tcjzrrojs/omrxXAJWE+lu
 ICTdKBJZnlgBpNWKUStoFMKCUPCIaBZqI/ldRluUsDohhLArUJDK0rjjsrhrZnRSCuLH
 aqLV67kEO2GdIoRi2JkUIotDgtSuNABx9xGVNYIpL4zp99pjIenm+tMc2I/Xg+Amy/bu
 RiyZNzmSHNpMdBHazh77yUwsWFUB1eH9Gn692k4LLipAoacuZiR81tUJW2X6rrty8bNG
 DNSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORIyuiatyL4eoWP88ZubG+frKRSD6nM7c/Z2I8RQGtv2PdWO9/79Cg8gwV7T35NAWQ1
X-Received: by 10.194.116.197 with SMTP id jy5mr24572594wjb.43.1453909895275; 
 Wed, 27 Jan 2016 07:51:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e9sm6792983wja.25.2016.01.27.07.51.34
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Wed, 27 Jan 2016 07:51:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:50:25 +0100
Message-ID: <3176479.ZPvIliTGUP@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1453905124-28544-1-git-send-email-anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
References: <1453903474-18807-1-git-send-email-anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
 <1453905124-28544-1-git-send-email-anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] vfio: Support for no-IOMMU mode
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:51:35 -0000

2016-01-27 14:32, Anatoly Burakov:
> +/* DMA mapping function prototype.
> + * Takes VFIO container fd as a parameter.
> + * Returns 0 on success, -1 on error.
> + * */
> +typedef  int (*vfio_dma_func_t)(int);
> +
> +struct vfio_iommu_type {
> +	int type_id;
> +	const char *name;
> +	vfio_dma_func_t dma_map_func;
> +};
> +
> +int vfio_iommu_type1_dma_map(int);
> +int vfio_iommu_noiommu_dma_map(int);

Is it possible (is it better) to declare these functions
with vfio_dma_func_t?

vfio_iommu_noiommu_dma_map is a weird name.
Why not vfio_noiommu_dma_map or vfio_iommu_none_dma_map?