From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f172.google.com (mail-wr0-f172.google.com [209.85.128.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCDE2B87 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 22:50:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr0-f172.google.com with SMTP id g19so36437105wrb.0 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 13:50:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oXDC1JrrfI35VTGKd3kcN4XzoxDfgZ8SlP4BAl+VtLU=; b=Q5uRBnv/EQvbf0ckURxahBzHhzOgWUYE0iFUyOm7QQ/l0ddH51U7ag8CXjqgimOk+B ZHNVjToxkH+q/PZKzStKdxBRSxdI7ei5Xo1BrxIEUbIKoWR5pux98FnyMhOM27yaB+DO BxKLvN8ttR8GfBL4XhPopokPm6U7D7IuspMt9QMPxQoFswBt9iOABRM3u6B32RqXxUqL L4UGjXaE/MYR+VPitQCcxGQMdQT5Rjsjxr3zsnJhIERQEYMNrw82iW/1mWqpXw4fDtr5 2Rnm//STnJcsx1xpvsaB+e2ngmqsZjsLXkziv8zW+ohxwLuFqsu6vDIhmsSzmGgNmCTT aivA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oXDC1JrrfI35VTGKd3kcN4XzoxDfgZ8SlP4BAl+VtLU=; b=EmbfxiAgNegMFDZrwg0nW8d4x7fFuWqXQNrV8M5m6dQGX0m02eYvA/TEvAMAS9I81O 44+IENx0ACFK4J8jocui2OPYKdlGuKgWKhqxYisZjB7BWL00kWlYAMS2yO5VUHwmXYge mjLH7IeQ1c5AJ28I8iZatFigrXY30V8X6eneQZ053lf3x49O8OR2EUfSdoqw/vnhuhvK sZkDYhajym1ZsVNaLFgskXsIeANKaAc/HbWDQaodwarHMzduxPrL3ddHVqjGagZ0aTlC 8KM6TTDHFvjT4HxE9kDWK1zxMzdX05LqeKlyWhcE/doe0oq5sULAh9YjEunAoijU/8OF P5Vw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1401LMIkg/JVDiDzJ4X+Yg7jnXMhjn6AerURxoAOY3Y48iqCqx+qk44O0wKlPKM17c X-Received: by 10.223.173.143 with SMTP id w15mr6378906wrc.125.1491511848451; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 13:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l14sm3440970wre.23.2017.04.06.13.50.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Apr 2017 13:50:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: John Daley , adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 22:50:46 +0200 Message-ID: <3201735.1C876yLKqy@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20170324023659.28099-2-johndale@cisco.com> References: <20170324023659.28099-1-johndale@cisco.com> <20170324023659.28099-2-johndale@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] ethdev: don't consider device state when validating flows X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 20:50:48 -0000 Ping, any progress on this patch? 2017-03-23 19:36, John Daley: > PMDs only consider if a flow would be accepted or not the assuming the > device had all it's resources available to it. Since state is not > considered, -EEXIST and -EBUSY return codes no longer make sense and > are removed. Also clarify the -ENOMEM has nothig to do with device > resouces, only host resources needed rte_flow_validate(). > > Signed-off-by: John Daley