From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8138A057B; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:34:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACED1C209; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:34:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1671C202 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:34:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3064F5C0240; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:34:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:34:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=7Kr1j67Rj+OvZp2Y3M1P532sX96ejIFovuJU/37Nhwk=; b=R7akio6P314t 4v02McbXuLv+8/trmv1p2SDldfnoN5koTLx+c6YiKvthaMzIrQ888C1xzbBg6NNl CJ9JjRGLecDoK+6zKPfS53jgdLOf0/ZA2NGo6j0eh8wmN+AWIUZX9B9u5RvVmT9f pBaJM+tScQp80s7f2bRpu/l898IFKQ8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=7Kr1j67Rj+OvZp2Y3M1P532sX96ejIFovuJU/37Nh wk=; b=3Xb+NaCSM8BpVlrbU/NIZotTQqcJryTxHy5yS9xa+r8YLi7zftAe8usa/ UxIpe5uNBcApcwr/yFLSgrCO5tapGSVaWBzhqjdePqT7+93IO8FOoLfXELKk/X5r nj9gE3cXSmAbeQ+HdFPobRtNNMkXC9SHuMMOtWSx46MiecpeK1pc1HY5yIhd2hpG rk2XMhkmyfIaJLMgSxLi2WgGEKuIAJyCGRGXgCeAwNR336XFbAlemQxn67/hICRK +9AJfDrYeURoJuH3TtB9UCNpL0/qyXh2QFbyFETZl3BfSP2SSlWX8wAITVJufjDg njfIYU0a1T6srrqJ1Sa56pvWMiEDQ== X-ME-Sender: <xms:p5GVXs6mqjoT4IDIo8iB5HqF4XSLilpx71P3oDUjV99EVHjnpwHyeQ> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrfedugddvlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehm ohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlh hushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshes mhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:qJGVXgIePLUjywdTJM9nS5FIxIlDdAFPnhEf7Zf14dXx0TthTCDSWQ> <xmx:qJGVXttuqn4SZeLMVxr-mj4-BlcgdWQuEl3uqQti3x-AU4cZe5sWRg> <xmx:qJGVXnJjvbgLhKi_2JhjlGBHjWvJ-2ie7At1uU8VE2-UyWbmVY_pyA> <xmx:qJGVXmE89MHGmy5PckCOgtKWazdZLmarz002lX2n843jmbpZwVmtEQ> Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4B43E3280063; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:34:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> To: declan.doherty@intel.com, akhil.goyal@nxp.com, roy.fan.zhang@intel.com, Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:34:13 +0200 Message-ID: <3209863.IobQ9Gjlxr@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1586859760-207446-2-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> References: <1586859760-207446-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> <1586859760-207446-2-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/crypto: do not check for IMB_VERSION_NUM X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> 14/04/2020 12:22, Pablo de Lara: > Now that capabilities are checked to see if an algorithm > is supported by a device, there is no need to check > for a specific version of a library used in a PMD. Yes, and even no need to check the PMD at all. All *_TEST_TARGET_PMD_* constants should be removed.