From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx6-phx2.redhat.com (mx6-phx2.redhat.com [209.132.183.39]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357E06CBB for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:27:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zmail25.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail25.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.31]) by mx6-phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9JERuCj030629; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:27:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:27:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Rozet To: Thomas F Herbert , Gregory Elkinbard , mskalski@mirantis.com, fzhadaev@mirantis.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org, Edward Warnicke , "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" Message-ID: <323284952.3467106.1476887275706.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <2986fc44-b2a1-f58c-62e0-eaf238a4fe08@redhat.com> References: <2986fc44-b2a1-f58c-62e0-eaf238a4fe08@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.10.59.43] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.6_GA_5922 (ZimbraWebClient - GC49 (Linux)/8.0.6_GA_5922) Thread-Topic: Problem showed up with OVS/DPDK with Cisco VIC adapter Thread-Index: HQHWljFPc66RKWb4p1OM3z3PkgjHNQ== Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [opnfv-tech-discuss] [apex][ovsnfv][fuel]Problem showed up with OVS/DPDK with Cisco VIC adapter X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:27:58 -0000 Fuel also supports the ovs dpdk scenario. Greg, Michal, Fedor, How do does Fuel get around this on the LF UCS hardware? Tim Rozet Red Hat SDN Team ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas F Herbert" To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org, "Edward Warnicke" Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 4:35:04 PM Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [apex][ovsnfv]Problem showed up with OVS/DPDK with Cisco VIC adapter All: This is not necessarily related to VPP but rather to OVS/DPDK. In OPNFV we found the following problem when using UCS NIC. The UCS fabric seems to set a VLAN tag on untagged packets. Any thoughts from DPDK and VPP folks would be appreciated. http://dpdk.org/doc/guides-16.07/nics/enic.html https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/APEX-333 It is currently deploying DPDK 16.04 and OVS 2.5.90 I could not find a user accessible setting to do this that would work. The workaround for now we came up with is to set a flow in OVS to strip the tag. https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/23315/ Another solution is to set the nic to strip the vlan in rte eth code or write a DPDK "app" to set the nic. http://dpdk.org/doc/guides-16.07/nics/enic.html --TFH -- Thomas F Herbert SDN Group Office of Technology Red Hat _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss