From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFD71BAC0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:00:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BC120D2F;
 Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:00:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:00:46 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=cWu2HDR/4gMvYNwpi/kBsgQZMq
 mwupD242P+1aKRDMs=; b=QJ0BA/YPBuav2hcSCEwny3sY4PqHdW8hEIVWAa2B5m
 gpKGn+zBfwc4/UOemo/zLK9805Opd6OYU7AxrnSZpLl0zSx7QDrLXDoXFT6qTuGo
 imRY0WA83m3fbVUo/B2pWTeWgrdiADF8jQTp1u8tIoCN6jJswk+f7+uHa2Y0pY1o
 o=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=cWu2HD
 R/4gMvYNwpi/kBsgQZMqmwupD242P+1aKRDMs=; b=pYMGcmT1IVnjYlDlo+p2e5
 VtGttCiDHxEyAMhLZpeBB7aZjPZpC2gpxdGPtvLbwmbLzCjLV6ivIbbCHxIstmmj
 VWI0v7LJwQ+u9qJEv8+cTOPfLvCvE5rw2r0VcbaJnVEDo+2PO8Ze8jflj5UKXrSF
 kTrUThomcEhbLTSotLqF+m6ZmiqfAMAh3cvT6paYkrNScEonPbJmYgS5a9eWW8YP
 mdMjzGmMR8Ozd4pmhfzM6Mr80Bi+WGWMF8zlXlXJ+izfeVYMNKJfJ+oyT+7O47Vp
 cSF+Tjfi8nLilxOFKexWdJz65u+m/AlqG3+OLuki7GnQb/ObVgjrsY7jujPPKfnQ
 ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:jerxWbAUUJ20w-2iT3xpEhe6fPvLhBEY470jiKwkP4ekQn4ZkFK5JQ>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9559124C96;
 Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:00:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
 David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
 Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
 Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>, borisp@mellanox.com,
 aviadye@mellanox.com, sandeep.malik@nxp.com,
 Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>, "Mcnamara,
 John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>, "Ananyev,
 Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, shahafs@mellanox.com,
 Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:00:44 +0200
Message-ID: <3244622.aFqJiogYnx@xps>
In-Reply-To: <2b57aec6-fc52-5d78-37cc-3eb3b19ac90c@nxp.com>
References: <1509013365-13819-1-git-send-email-radu.nicolau@intel.com>
 <1548422.ftI5jb3vlP@xps> <2b57aec6-fc52-5d78-37cc-3eb3b19ac90c@nxp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/ixgbe: fix build issue
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:00:46 -0000

26/10/2017 15:16, Akhil Goyal:
> On 10/26/2017 6:37 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 26/10/2017 14:59, Akhil Goyal:
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >>
> >> On 10/26/2017 6:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 26/10/2017 14:28, Radu Nicolau:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/26/2017 12:39 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>>>> 26/10/2017 13:27, David Marchand:
> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 10/26/2017 11:36 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/Makefile
> >>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/Makefile
> >>>>>>>>> +ifneq ($(MAKECMDGOALS),clean)
> >>>>>>>>> +ifneq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY),y)
> >>>>>>>>> +$(error "RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY is required to build RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD")
> >>>>>>>>> +endif
> >>>>>>>>> +endif
> >>>>>>>> This is a no go for me unless you explain how it is impossible to
> >>>>>>>> disable it in the code.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It can be disabled in the code, but as far as I know there is a general push
> >>>>>>> back against having conditionally compiled code. I originally had the
> >>>>>>> security sections in ixgbe PMD isolated, but the feedback was to have them
> >>>>>>> always on.
> >>>>>> In my mind, this was to stop having features enabled per pmd (and stop
> >>>>>> the nightmare with 10 options in a pmd).
> >>>>>> Having features globally enabled for all or nothing is still
> >>>>>> acceptable, is it not ?
> >>>>> Yes there is a config option for rte_security,
> >>>>> and it is acceptable.
> >>>>> The code depending on it must be ifdef'ed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Given that both ixgbe and dpaa2_sec are now security enabled PMDs, I
> >>>> would go with Konstantin's proposal, have rte_security listed as a
> >>>> dependency (instead of the explicit check).
> >>>
> >>> Please consider my request instead.
> >>> Until now we are ifdef'ing code to allow disabling any lib.
> >>> We are not going to change our mind during the last days of a release.
> >>> Please just fix it for now.
> >>
> >> For dpaa2_sec we do not want to make the driver run without
> >> rte_security. We do not see people using it without rte_security.
> > 
> > Why not?
> We see a lot of performance difference in the two cases. People may not 
> like to see a lower performance for the same protocol processing.
> 
> > 
> >> Will take the Makefile changes that Radu has done in 1st patch of this
> >> series.
> > 
> > Is it really a lot to ifdef?
> As I see it would be around 12-13 checks in 2 files.
> > 
> > It is going to break compilation of DPDK for those who disable rte_security.
> > 
> 
> Well I would say, if people do not need rte_security then they can 
> disable dpaa2_sec_pmd also.

OK