From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674E22E41 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 21:52:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wibgn9 with SMTP id gn9so79898838wib.1 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:52:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=utO5zAYh0LSQoBKQemdlX+mvUvkLv6zw6iV1/nxSL2g=; b=mtot6yZNQ9RQaNGYdHqqYl58y7xF8SBsbNy8Xn+Mr8C9h1y5DySOY+can1jIXSD3t9 jBlIHdaylDU86EDe7KIccc6KChxlx2R5mVr/ea7kcvLs7mWfiIUyy4E7RrCdshFXO8Tv O5kEZUWIn1MnsG/krGrebnm7QLvX9a4fN2voGK2Ggk7LYMYGjUgKI06vON/4pa103U74 p3alTVh0e6kW6QrcH0e3ihTrUkym3hYsRH64l3w/Fg5EAw9xTsUGknCWuNbDHjckqgbP 3hfogf9mlct27dmwnTNffBhDNcSlw9Tjru4eCJlDCcTHTT+Ptp9peVUedY8mLDfDRa6V nnRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl2LZWoeQ0eAexyDB8AWsT1GwDnCkCEKzzjv5z2gz9zQtEExRdiCzhitw1OffiwB2Jm694w X-Received: by 10.194.81.104 with SMTP id z8mr85658654wjx.45.1427917957236; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:52:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g2sm30621758wib.1.2015.04.01.12.52.36 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:52:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Zhang, XiaonanX" , "Cao, Waterman" Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:51:55 +0200 Message-ID: <32480824.oD8BQeRvMH@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.4 (Linux/3.18.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <63FB47D6C0357E428AA804B2C89068BA012D58D6@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1427855614-8654-1-git-send-email-cunming.liang@intel.com> <63FB47D6C0357E428AA804B2C89068BA012D58D6@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: fix no effect wait_to_complete on link_get X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:52:38 -0000 Hi, 2015-04-01 06:10, Zhang, XiaonanX: > > Tested-by: Xiaonan zhang > > - OS: Fedora21 3.19.1-201.fc21.x86_64 > - GCC: gcc version 4.9.1 20140930 (Red Hat 4.9.1-11) (GCC) > - CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz > - NIC: Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller X710 for 10GbE SFP+ [8086:1572] (rev 01) > - Default x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc configuration > - Total 1 cases, 1 passed, 0 failed > > - Test case: Used Qos example to verified > ------------------------------------- What is the relation between link status timeout and qos_sched? > Traffic shaping for subport. Check that the subport rate is enforced. > > Set the subport output rate to x% of line rate (x = 10 .. 100). Set the subport TC limits high (100% line rate each), so they do not constitute limitations. Input traffic is 100% line rate. > > Different tb period and tb credits, therefore different output rate, are tried: 25%, 50%, 75%, 90% and 100% the lineal rate. (The output for subport is Tb credits per period / Tb period.) > The traffic is injected change subport value random. > > Other parameters are same before tests and they don't change here. > > Cmdline: ./examples/qos_sched/build/qos_sched -c 0xe -n 4 -- --pfc "0,1,2,3,3" --cfg "/root/profile_sched_pipe_1.cfg" > > The result is this table: > > > +-----------------------+----------------------+ > | Subport output rate | Subport output rate | > | (% line rate) | (Mpps) | > +-----------+-----------+----------+-----------+ > | Expected | Actual | Expected | Actual | > +-----------+-----------+----------+-----------+ This table is empty. > > Signed-off-by: Xiaonan Zhang It seems that this test report is not relevant. It will be ignored in the commit message. Sorry