From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49307A0542; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 14:07:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E383340694; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 14:07:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426D140143 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 14:07:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB3B320046E; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 08:07:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 05 Oct 2022 08:07:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1664971623; x= 1665058023; bh=XHirj6u0Rbd52/sweObLovLvoceEsmFqFKKgJ+iIRUg=; b=L RaOPV3QR7UT45pcqKLla/KrkJkVY/j/ZO8Snkahe1pTSPCozYJB7RBNKu7787F4u yzZNuHfUbdJqsDA7M51haYFDo7f31jOqqVHzBq+9cv5dsaQ5RhR/KIPMcukpu8L0 PVRqQcYyi3KAVbqaS+icaYzu+PR+tSeL6Tb4wS8r6154O2+viM+JXtw78/3ythBu d4jC4MSZmGozKW+eK+rG2ywr6s7GphjPjzwyTp03H+gzPzqstD8ce6JsuSch0igt Ws9R2qcWCX4UDy2R/fzsYTgep21I4P0O+3YeeqR00gT2HkDUAIkvK9urotkZk7Fr CGJeIInVAHd2sMs77h5Pw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1664971623; x= 1665058023; bh=XHirj6u0Rbd52/sweObLovLvoceEsmFqFKKgJ+iIRUg=; b=q ct5OhwHI3UxJwa7ROfJ2SC/XktaqvIMK9CB6+EPAntDRnET2kjXiRaA7X/ZAtKzf 3UWfK13ZENvlg7/K4l6zOeOcT8uvtj4q136iQxOmXSaC6ifV10CV8zbU50fRM3aR YVZC9cy73bYm8V82seFYsnZJDznMd2UV+WiEKWVhta+BSE6ih5OSOJCsPRuaIpXS vkkTuiedl5xWmc68beiDyNbsf403eqCzMzKfayhocmIhC3IsFy0Qj6Z8NqxmWpE9 vTSFxHlW7s5l23rxu5GohWqkQ1NPdS6EybjnyqFsb+vXFeYgb/TW6Q+uEaWS0Q+T U+0PHYdi2KzKrQGO5tGCA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeeifedggeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejjefffffgffekfefflefgkeelteejffelledugefhheelffet heevudffudfgvdenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 08:07:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Kevin Laatz Cc: David Marchand , dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, mb@smartsharesystems.com, lizh@nvidia.com, matan@nvidia.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, lihuisong@huawei.com, Parav Pandit , "Xueming(Steven) Li" , Rosen Xu , Hemant Agrawal , Sachin Saxena , Long Li , Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] eal: add bus cleanup to eal cleanup Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 14:06:59 +0200 Message-ID: <3259588.h16uAIiOU7@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20220419161438.1837860-1-kevin.laatz@intel.com> <18500914.fAMKPKieAE@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 05/10/2022 13:03, Kevin Laatz: > Hi Thomas, All, > > On 05/10/2022 10:41, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 05/10/2022 09:45, David Marchand: > >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 6:47 PM Kevin Laatz wrote: > >>> This patch proposes adding bus cleanup to the eal_cleanup() to make EAL's > >>> init/exit more symmetrical, ensuring all bus devices are cleaned up > >>> appropriately without the application needing to be aware of all bus types > >>> that may have been probed during initialization. > >>> > >>> Contained in this patch are the changes required to perform cleanup for > >>> devices on the PCI bus and VDEV bus during eal_cleanup(). There would be an > >>> ask for bus maintainers to add the relevant cleanup for their buses since > >>> they have the domain expertise. > >> Cc: maintainers for info. > > Kevin, > > When you don't go to the end of a task, you must ask help to complete it. > > Here you assume others will do it, > > but you don't even Cc the relevant maintainers. > > > > Please could you track that all buses will get the implementation? > > You should open a bugzilla ticket for each bus, > > and assign it to the relevant maintainer. > > Thanks > > > Bugzilla tickets created: > > [auxiliary] https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090 > [dpaa] https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1091 > [fslmc] https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1092 > [vmbus] https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1093 > [ifpga] https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1094 > > I've assigned to maintainers that have a registered account with Bugzilla. > > I was not able to assign the iFPGA ticket to Rosen Xu since his email is > not registered. Thanks, please don't hesitate to ping again if there is no fast enough progress.