DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
Cc: dsosnowski@nvidia.com, ferruh.yigit@amd.com,
	cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru,
	stephen@networkplumber.org, dev@dpdk.org, rasland@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ethdev: introduce encap hash calculation
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 23:39:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3266952.oiGErgHkdL@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240128093943.4461-2-orika@nvidia.com>

28/01/2024 10:39, Ori Kam:
> During the encapsulation of a packet, it is expected to calculate the
> hash value which is based on the original packet (the outer values,
> which will become the inner values).

It is not clear what the hash is for.

> The tunnel protocol defines which tunnel field should hold this hash,
> but it doesn't define the hash calculation algorithm.

If the hash is stored in the packet header,
I expect it to be reproducible when being checked.
How the algorithm may be undefined?

> An application that uses flow offloads gets the first few packets
> and then decides to offload the flow. As a result, there are two
> different paths that a packet from a given flow may take.
> SW for the first few packets or HW for the rest.
> When the packet goes through the SW, the SW encapsulates the packet
> and must use the same hash calculation as the HW will do for
> the rest of the packets in this flow.
> 
> This patch gives the SW a way to query the hash value
> for a given packet as if the packet was passed through the HW.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
> ---
> +Calculate encap hash
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +Calculating hash of a packet in SW as it would be calculated in HW for the encap action

We should give the real full name of the flow action.

> +
> +When the HW execute an encapsulation action, it may calculate an hash value which is based
> +on the original packet. This hash is stored depending on the encapsulation protocol, in one
> +of the outer fields.

Give an example of such encapsulation protocol?

> +This function allows the application to calculate the hash for a given packet as if the
> +encapsulation was done in HW.
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +   int
> +   rte_flow_calc_encap_hash(uint16_t port_id,
> +                            const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> +			                   enum rte_flow_encap_hash_field dest_field,
> +                            uint8_t hash_len,
> +                            uint8_t *hash,
> +			                   struct rte_flow_error *error);

I don't think we should add the complete prototype in this guide.

[...]
> +/**
> + * @warning
> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
> + *
> + * Simulates HW hash calculation that is done when encap action is being used.

s/Simulates/Simulate/

> + *
> + * @param[in] port_id
> + *   Port identifier of Ethernet device.
> + * @param[in] pattern
> + *   The values to be used in the hash calculation.
> + * @param[in] dest_field
> + *   Type of destination field for hash calculation.
> + * @param[in] hash_len
> + *   The length of the hash pointer in bytes. Should be according to encap_hash_field.
> + * @param[out] hash
> + *   Used to return the calculated hash. It will be written in network order,
> + *   so hash[0] is the MSB.
> + *   The number of bytes is based on the destination field type.
> + * @param[out] error
> + *   Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL.
> + *   PMDs initialize this structure in case of error only.
> + *
> + * @return
> + *   - (0) if success.
> + *   - (-ENODEV) if *port_id* invalid.
> + *   - (-ENOTSUP) if underlying device does not support this functionality.
> + *   - (-EINVAL) if *pattern* doesn't hold enough information to calculate the hash
> + *               or the dest is not supported.
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +int
> +rte_flow_calc_encap_hash(uint16_t port_id, const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> +			 enum rte_flow_encap_hash_field dest_field, uint8_t hash_len,
> +			 uint8_t *hash, struct rte_flow_error *error);




  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-28  9:39 [PATCH 0/4] " Ori Kam
2024-01-28  9:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] ethdev: " Ori Kam
2024-02-01  8:40   ` Ori Kam
2024-02-06 22:39   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2024-02-07  6:56     ` Ori Kam
2024-02-07  9:25       ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-01-28  9:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] net/mlx5/hws: introduce encap entropy hash calculation API Ori Kam
2024-01-28  9:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] net/mlx5: add calc encap hash support Ori Kam
2024-01-28  9:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] app/testpmd: add encap hash calculation Ori Kam
2024-01-31 18:30 ` [PATCH 0/4] introduce " Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-08  9:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ethdev: " Ori Kam
2024-02-08  9:09   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] net/mlx5/hws: introduce encap entropy hash calculation API Ori Kam
2024-02-08  9:09   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] net/mlx5: add calc encap hash support Ori Kam
2024-02-08  9:09   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] app/testpmd: add encap hash calculation Ori Kam
2024-02-08 17:13   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ethdev: introduce " Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-11  7:29     ` Ori Kam
2024-02-12 17:05       ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-12 18:44         ` Ori Kam
2024-02-12 20:09           ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-13  7:05             ` Ori Kam
2024-02-13 13:48 ` [PATCH v3 " Ori Kam
2024-02-13 13:48   ` [PATCH v3 2/4] net/mlx5/hws: introduce encap entropy hash calculation API Ori Kam
2024-02-13 13:48   ` [PATCH v3 3/4] net/mlx5: add calc encap hash support Ori Kam
2024-02-13 13:48   ` [PATCH v3 4/4] app/testpmd: add encap hash calculation Ori Kam
2024-02-13 14:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] ethdev: introduce " Ori Kam
2024-02-13 14:16   ` [PATCH v4 2/4] net/mlx5/hws: introduce encap entropy hash calculation API Ori Kam
2024-02-13 14:16   ` [PATCH v4 3/4] net/mlx5: add calc encap hash support Ori Kam
2024-02-13 14:16   ` [PATCH v4 4/4] app/testpmd: add encap hash calculation Ori Kam
2024-02-13 15:45     ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-13 15:45   ` [PATCH v4 1/4] ethdev: introduce " Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-13 15:45     ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3266952.oiGErgHkdL@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).