From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53649A0588; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:49:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7381DBEE; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:49:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39CB1DBE2 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:49:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3896D3; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 06:49:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 06:49:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=GxscVo7qvTkpCIxR6/o094F2s7WstBDoDFjltykGhRs=; b=GmdfYAAw8Tq0 /MdAfjGqLglzosQ+52zckpVvD6dJoYehsan+T/5q196zm3XEtekps1B3VbuKPRY/ 4CvCWKM8hBDvUbQKwwM7pEZF29vP3ErQ2KB/XFntwRXCWBDHuMVdOInvwt+XQZK5 xaKuo4Xk1kOu0fsjawXLynm/Dor6pls= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=GxscVo7qvTkpCIxR6/o094F2s7WstBDoDFjltykGh Rs=; b=sxpJktnKY3gaM39utTUrxugxjcjm8dje3OkK4aaJKUf2Avdi+4aWpJ8ad CVwrCZC6n9NT4c4igX3SAwe2oB2QHKy0Dh+eUjGaYk+SZ1CYWolvpYvEollrpd+Y 1JGx0si+8LJxp2HBjI72kZpetKIyE+rBPJQdgGztCd4BChC+oxQKWOj2UTqIgx2P 9ObqvAyj2wVctIY+4YD3JUBSzjSrO9S+3QDvVhwx9m9k2b31gKpoWEwOh75N0YHG r48NQOe1FFoY6kzWWj2rkfsuAj0GO6Brnzm2BJS03ndNCjpEhI5FHUR/8HjHqbVW JnTDAvhUJXHpRcFddDDa46apkaK2g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrfeehgdeffecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrsh esmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4524F306005F; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 06:49:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dpdk-dev Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:49:25 +0200 Message-ID: <3282554.2IRrRt1zHL@thomas> In-Reply-To: <8eca65be-5d96-7b8c-f517-9cb648972167@intel.com> References: <8eca65be-5d96-7b8c-f517-9cb648972167@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 16/04/2020 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 16/04/2020 12:06, Ferruh Yigit: > * Marvell, Arm, Mellanox & Broadcom already sent roadmap for 20.05, all > vendors please share the roadmap for the release. I think it is too late now for 20.05 roadmap :-) > Subtrees > -------- > > * main > * There are still lots of patches, a lot of reviews are missing > * Sub-trees will be pulled next week Monday/Tuesday > * Sub-trees should be ready by EOD Friday or Saturday > * Thomas did review on graph library, planning to get it as it is No I did not review rte_graph. But as it is here for long, it should be merged. > * Trace library will be merged for -rc1, the review was missing but at least > feedback requested David worked on rte_trace reviews. More reviews were expected. We hope there will be more feedback after the merge as experimental. Please let's have open feedback, don't be shy asking for rework if you have any enhancement idea. > * Some library features may go in for -rc2 due to big backlog We will try to minimize feature additions in -rc2 if any. > * If the work is not finished, planning to block related patches > * Example: ABI breaks for false positive, don't get patches that > breaks ABI before fixing the ABI check tools. Yes we should block patches more often to get work done. We can find other examples in crypto or ethdev. We need to define clear deadlines. Example: any patch in a PMD will be blocked after a deadline if the PMD does not comply with the requested rework, as RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE behaviour. > * next-net > * Less than 50 patches in the backlog > * Some ethdev patches are not merged yet, close but not ready for -rc1 > * mlx set that break the ABI not clarified yet, it may be dropped from tree > > * next-crypto > * ~50 patches in backlog, reviewed most of them, will apply today > * ipsec patch depends on hash change which is for main repo > * Thomas will look to it with priority It seems hash patches are not ready or not reviewed. > * ABI related crypto patch will be reviewed today > * There is a reported build error from Raslan Looks to be not reproduced. [...] > * 18.11.7 released > * http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20200415173701.19706-1-ktraynor@redhat.com/ Congratulations Kevin!