From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Liu, Jijiang" <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 17:07:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3291312.KsF87lF78O@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213BC0A5@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
> > We have got some feedback about backward compatibility of VXLAN TX checksum offload API with 1G/10G NIC after the i40e VXLAN
> > TX checksum codes were applied, so we have to rework the APIs on i40e, including the changes of mbuf, i40e PMD and csum forward
> > engine.
> >
> > The main changes in mbuf are as follows, in place of removing PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM, we introduce 4 new flags:
> > PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM, PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4, PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6 and PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT. Replace the inner_l2_len
> > and the inner_l3_len field with the outer_l2_len and outer_l3_len field.
> >
> > Let's use a few examples to demonstrate how to use these new flags and existing flags in rte_mbuf.h
> > Let say we have a tunnel packet: eth_hdr_out/ipv4_hdr_out/udp_hdr_out/vxlan_hdr/ehtr_hdr_in/ipv4_hdr_in/tcp_hdr_in. There
> > could be several scenarios:
> >
> > A) User requests HW offload for ipv4_hdr_out checksum.
> > He doesn't care is it a tunnelled packet or not. So he sets:
> >
> > mb->l2_len = eth_hdr_out;
> > mb->l3_len = ipv4_hdr_out;
> > mb->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IPV4_CSUM;
> >
> > B) User is aware that it is a tunnelled packet and requests HW offload for ipv4_hdr_in and tcp_hdr_in *only*.
> > He doesn't care about outer IP checksum offload. In that case, for FVL he has 2 choices:
> > 1. Treat that packet as a 'proper' tunnelled packet, and fill all the fields:
> > mb->l2_len = udp_hdr_out + vxlan_hdr +eth_hdr_in;
> > mb->l3_len = ipv4_hdr_in;
> > mb->outer_l2_len = eth_hdr_out;
> > mb->outer_l3_len = ipv4_hdr_out;
> > mb->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT | PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM;
> >
> > 2. As user doesn't care about outer IP hdr checksum, he can treat everything before ipv4_hdr_in as L2 header.
> > So he knows, that it is a tunnelled packet, but makes HW to treat it as ordinary (non-tunnelled) packet:
> > mb->l2_len = eth_hdr_out + ipv4_hdr_out + udp_hdr_out + vxlan_hdr + ehtr_hdr_in;
> > mb->l3_len = ipv4_hdr_in;
> > mb->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM;
> >
> > i40e PMD will support both B.1 and B.2, but ixgbe/igb/em PMD supports only B.2.
> > if HW supports both - it will be up to user app which method to choose.
> > tespmd will support both methods, and it should be configurable by user which approach to use (cmdline parameter).
> > So the user can try/test both methods and select an appropriate for him.
> >
> > C) User knows that is a tunnelled packet, and wants HW offload for all 3 checksums: outer IP hdr checksum, inner IP checksum, inner
> > TCP checksum.
> > Then he has to setup all TX checksum fields:
> > mb->l2_len = udp_hdr_out + vxlan_hdr +eth_hdr_in;;
> > mb->l3_len = ipv4_hdr_in;
> > mb->outer_l2_len = eth_hdr_out;
> > mb->outer_l3_len = ipv4_hdr_out;
> > mb->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_OUT_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT | PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM;
> >
> > Change notes:
> > v2 changes:
> > remove PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM alias.
> > add PKT_TX_OUT_IP_CKSUM and PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6 in rte_get_tx_ol_flag_name.
> > spliting mbuf changes into two patches.
> > fix MACLEN caculation issue in i40e driver
> > fix some issues in csumonly.c
> > change cover letter.
> > v3 changes:
> > fix MACLEN caculation issue in i40e driver when non-tunneling packet
> > v4 changes:
> > reorganize patches to avoid compilation to be broken between patches.
> > remove l4_tun_len from mbuf structure.
> > add PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4 to indicate no IP checksum offload requirement for tunneling packet.
> > change i40e PMD and csum engine due to above changes.
> >
> > v5 changes:
> > according to Konstantin's comments, optimize process_outer_cksums() in order to avoid setting PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4 flags for the
> > case when user didn't enable TESTPMD_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_CKSUM
> >
> > Jijiang Liu (3):
> > Redefine PKT_TX_IPV4, PKT_TX_IPV6 and PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT;
> > Replace PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM with PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT, and add 3 TX flags, which are PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM,
> > PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4 and PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6,and rework csum forward engine and i40e pmd due to these changes;
> > Replace the inner_l2_len and the inner_l3_len field with the outer_l2_len and outer_l3_len field, and rework csum forward engine
> > and i40e pmd due to these changes;
>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Applied with small comments changes suggested by Olivier.
Thanks everyone for finding a consensus.
It's not easy to accept different of views but we finally did it!
Lesson learned: every details of an API must be explicited with clear and
short sentences.
Thanks
--
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-05 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-02 15:06 Jijiang Liu
2014-12-02 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] mbuf:redefine three TX ol_flags Jijiang Liu
2014-12-03 11:35 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-02 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] mbuf:add three TX ol_flags and repalce PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM Jijiang Liu
2014-12-03 11:41 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-03 12:59 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-03 14:41 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-04 2:08 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-12-04 10:23 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-04 10:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-04 11:03 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-04 13:51 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-04 22:56 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-05 4:17 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-12-04 6:52 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-04 7:52 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-12-04 10:19 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-04 13:47 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-04 21:42 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-05 1:15 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-05 11:11 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-02 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] mbuf:replace the inner_l2_len and the inner_l3_len fields Jijiang Liu
2014-12-03 11:45 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-05 11:12 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-02 15:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] i40e VXLAN TX checksum rework Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-05 16:07 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2014-12-07 11:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3291312.KsF87lF78O@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jijiang.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).