From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637FCA04B7; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:47:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE251DCB4; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:47:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52D91DC4C for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:47:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB3F5802D5; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:47:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:47:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= 1W8ywfFjgwiEcSAHfkjygQRx0iolZjJYMsQU7c20xDs=; b=baCzzYcUbkwA2wuG 5Mg+AnlYIDnKJM3+7Lc57G4QUQAOMGv8wX/i6k0cWgXHC2kAyqPOnK1ZdlWdPTHH kE2H88PFYk5T4oOGufdWuPVNhQHvw9JY4fn0Fh0pV5GBBdcnTtIHJ8wZWFP1uE1R H1tCeKwpTKGA9mx5C6iLHZZ8982E737LyYnhqj1JknFuIKS2sQKx7DMxIt7desZK /UkJIu1rab5Mzp8WI9ZOK4VDihBB5VuFwZH7rVkyTvnwDgsTXQsBUIJKMnkZARi6 1JWUCdEVk6lClKhfIrX97ljhlnG83KMPx1C/o+Lhw14LkGQvyIR4YlN+es2Nwh+0 JSmnTg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=1W8ywfFjgwiEcSAHfkjygQRx0iolZjJYMsQU7c20x Ds=; b=XhoWgtmavUAnB2ByD/5OasBP3XZkGHq/W6aCjAkfkFMQ7rHqNM0WN4PfW 5xChSk1038fQcw4rB8/JuwdaXsndOSk5IxJN2vYysSksK+IZFexObYis1ezcZHsT NtiBhXL4L2yKjnN2GxUyGxfyL79JUQqasiAyD88BFUBjn6l7geaRvfDBSAszmNEr 68lz60LSymZcBPxnxXv6aim8VwkR5+7eZ6uftPQd+RSSHt3eStK1wf3VeMVGMsvG ZXW0K0JUHvQ23LALHVd98vi6o4cQYSVwg11u2HseZtmnxyOWtU1ZjJClki3PEVGp Yks0BxYrtAMmOQIF/cXYZiYxRtGmQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedriedugddtkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehm ohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeegle fghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeuieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddt fedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A95763064684; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:47:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: guyk@marvell.com Cc: orika@mellanox.com, dev@dpdk.org, jerinj@marvell.com, smadarf@marvell.com, dovrat@marvell.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, ktraynor@redhat.com Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:47:09 +0200 Message-ID: <3312477.OZWf0QDG0M@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200908123144.26444-2-guyk@marvell.com> References: <20200908123144.26444-1-guyk@marvell.com> <20200908123144.26444-2-guyk@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/l3fwd-regex: add regex based l3fwd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 08/09/2020 14:31, guyk@marvell.com: > From: Guy Kaneti > > Add regex based l3fwd application > inline with normal l3fwd. only LPM is supported. The trend is to reduce the number of example applications. Do you think regex could be an option in the original l3fwd?