From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [64.147.123.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD421B1C3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:30:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CCF316;
 Wed, 11 Jul 2018 05:30:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 05:30:36 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=rF5PFOiozQYYOI5xW3k8HVjBVz
 xKxmhaRjecbzJ3wjw=; b=cj8q8cUDf8Sxu6UIlEM5c9q+UrJfHiQKlYEnQ18SjJ
 SdnTpSkb88RFAroON8TMfuASM+0Ea02ecS/dByTwXHiI9JV45+oSBg1pWcRDwdm0
 R0sYtvzeTSvpVLdKkRBeabNCtHiTtnFMsciTxQrmVeeSP0pqRufqy+UwhxLLlMym
 8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=rF5PFO
 iozQYYOI5xW3k8HVjBVzxKxmhaRjecbzJ3wjw=; b=b4FCFyIQobL+fNCC+k0FqE
 moVi8d30RJQkVV46oST3zbzDsWtRhaiK1xlYy+GCH6nkMod3QzXwfRT3g7ccFZp1
 CETWIje8MxkryOMU7obc6ISXuZyQxIPBQ0JePvfzeBf0MN3j8SiUgL7XcY6C8wQW
 C1m++qnG+Y21OUKFUE80pC3Pc/QGocYfnxujK9ao6imWlO1ggGwPLrsRun7SERhq
 9Rb+4HKTCwZNK9MhPW19rFfXRiXfYVzIaBB1wqnmxNkF3BnxUbDY91FTZR+KCnxa
 maveaKAJwHrkiRXizs7JyTRoTThfsyIBoolzWmaJmqKDMucRwSaCT1GrUz7e13nQ
 ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Os5FW7_UETMaLLYU0DuRSLaIAXaR-0YBXM-7IJWoNnUYvce8hOQtZg>
 <xmx:Os5FW6LpF7oZQvrVtNV-t6O-NclYhavM46juCQhG6NUEehvHLrgg7g>
 <xmx:Os5FW5PLErXJywXhhY4_zrUIgNfOQ9Xl_FFGp1KjmQHptwYtlQZ4xA>
 <xmx:Os5FW-9wobDgprLa4yNtj5EsLnee7r7WhocNuKmGJ7Ln57B8QS5O2Q>
 <xmx:Os5FWyKsDC8J7_iBcJuvnapsuDPP3BKfFcG2ps-1PngA8V48AAtMFA>
 <xmx:PM5FW1R7z7kc1EGVLvesc1pPflAr3G_9ClaXf-2OPwnNQdkptW1URg>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Os5FWw-GSZy01B3SN2rmgiUc8IHIXulyLFj60h3WuCCBvO7GZgLCzQ>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5088BE45C9;
 Wed, 11 Jul 2018 05:30:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ga=EBtan?= Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:30:32 +0200
Message-ID: <3367029.O4eSh4CbOy@xps>
In-Reply-To: <20180711084116.dbbou4vbbp2y5tcn@bidouze.vm.6wind.com>
References: <cover.1530791217.git.gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
 <2914659.2M3dPKUJVY@xps>
 <20180711084116.dbbou4vbbp2y5tcn@bidouze.vm.6wind.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 08/27] devargs: add function to parse
	device layers
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:30:37 -0000

11/07/2018 10:41, Ga=EBtan Rivet:
> > > +	struct rte_bus *bus; /**< bus handle. */
> > > +	struct rte_class *cls; /**< class handle. */
> >=20
> > "class" is more readable than "cls"
> >=20
>=20
> I was thinking that maybe this could be a problem when trying to build
> with C++. The EAL headers in DPDK are meant to be included in C++ apps,
> I think ``class`` would be an issue then.

Yes, right.

So only options are "cls" or "devclass".
Up to you.

> If I'm mistaken, then sure, class is a better name.