From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FB42BD2 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 12:27:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id p190so141088932wmp.1 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 04:27:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0P1tB7NqqiYdmyDvnM8Wt9FwyMAJJ8kD154yc9th8NE=; b=MsEFwv3L+s/dIWcvqJ1+mMe3IgOHbFcBYSjsctuAF7DQ0VIkvcWGijV+9MNANQFltf VVMQStIHFovUlVovihMZF60O+DI01aZy8kITI1xY+fUBtwvy7FOoZs3fBLdrlZckadQq fkZQzHnW8nfm4Rnka0rs4a8GanJhB2KCsEzfbTtcAKbmhwW7xQCjulum27wKLKt3yCQ8 7GZCvy0hGnY/NrC6PRQ+96XBP+NAwfPiYiEyxL9EkJnI8hiQgPJ3uANhJufCHbHxj5T4 FcUiibEUjzGkitFbl6JaPM5+kTuFjDMWak6KuhxIGrPQcpEY1pmioYX5t1pPcY02kuEr gQHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0P1tB7NqqiYdmyDvnM8Wt9FwyMAJJ8kD154yc9th8NE=; b=GJwsKMc8YKoJ/N1HyyVYrJ/TZ1PgcvND7PtEDkCbeo+ZcmSqX53/5gal03MGJ28Har U9vKNKwOqGk/eKOKCMxr915jCPkWlpgYrfOWaPU+l7c9zhDVD5V0eAL0wfEtF7P7uXYG EU8mVN+VPAzMgUY4lLQJ8kJTP9qX7mH8TkFMuyyqmo5xcBMKBBfsilgu6nCGTuQuthGV 1IUu13M7QXs8nOSeurpmtuhKiBB98gcGMdV8aPHMgSW8BehKGnsfwLDmLoPKLXtDG3V4 oaM/J0LxurXyFOgjv5yuVcw45GXas6I1fJPMseG55r4RumVj0m/z2ns5gokLMpSzUS0s PkRA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvemCcN0O5R7IbihotDWUxTUvIGtrcjsSeM3N2ooHKUZyPQ9choA2a2JjaVN+7M6oMfX X-Received: by 10.28.88.73 with SMTP id m70mr11244626wmb.19.1477913251303; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 04:27:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (103.114.118.80.rev.sfr.net. [80.118.114.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r72sm24333181wmd.21.2016.10.31.04.27.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 04:27:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=E9lio?= Laranjeiro Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 12:27:29 +0100 Message-ID: <3394000.hODjKmm7Ki@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20161031104318.GC4823@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com> References: <20161031104318.GC4823@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Red Hat 6.5 compilation failure X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 11:27:31 -0000 2016-10-31 11:43, N=E9lio Laranjeiro: > Hi all, >=20 > Am facing an issue with compilation on redhat 6.5 of DPDK v16.11-rc2,= Thanks Nelio for raising the issue. > compilation fails with: [...] > In doc/guides/rel_notes/supported_os.rst we still support > "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.5". >=20 > Do we still want to support it, or should we update the documentation= to > remove it? I vote for dropping RHEL6 support in DPDK 16.11. Any other comment in the community? Please give your voice, whether you agree or disagree.