From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com
 [209.85.212.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BA4B5F6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:47:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id r20so48267363wiv.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:47:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=B6gttcO+W1zWYdvsbk/dGD7gnttSud3ORIR5G2ohGxk=;
 b=I6aGgOhNVFrBMzts07f8kbhVDQ/ie+VxWO7y8oaLS148XCqoLnc1P+/dDEaKRTSH+/
 u8bb8LU9oOAdVvqDB+yGfmB8pel2jYp78d1mhUzO6V4lPg+WZKiqKzEH9ZMkWJHffqwQ
 LNWsjPAJP+cVqTuJ3t5QqR3Wk79+7Sxk8t8bJorwLCSxQp/oppBl/vpHZbo/ZkbyIhDs
 uKFMuXgJO2O/b1trXB6GVGOEGKsBRc2xgcixTMS/4KNNN4mySFWTN4a3gxh3guU6M53E
 UI3D49awpaFP1U153DEuG/rVZwu+W7BIGRZmjBm1fl7ri3yhfihV3VVy6igJtzqXuLop
 gRtw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnPGzc7zfaz027RyKZC2dc1f1ujAwbdp8GPtLQhdrZbfm2bcMDCfzJYdvhWz2cgXy9iZQrg
X-Received: by 10.180.187.200 with SMTP id fu8mr10726279wic.28.1424353620379; 
 Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gz3sm18141689wib.1.2015.02.19.05.46.59
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:46:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:46:30 +0100
Message-ID: <3427184.DR4H9RgUjS@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.4 (Linux/3.18.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.4; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20150219130829.GE24069@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
References: <20150217103507.7da72f1a@uryu.home.lan>
 <20150219130829.GE24069@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemming@brocade.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Patches outstanding
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:47:00 -0000

2015-02-19 08:08, Neil Horman:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:35:07AM -0500, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > There are currently 1039 patches outstanding on DPDK.
> > What is the schedule for getting these merged or resolved?
> > I don't think it would be reasonable to declare 2.0 as done
> > until the patch backlog is 0!
> > 
> 
> I think the subtrees were supposed to start biting into this, but I don't see
> them getting used yet.

Yes
Actually the main problem is still on reviews.
There are more good reviews in this cycle.
But some patchset are not reviewed and some others are acked
without being carefully reviewed.