DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
To: "akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
	"ashish.gupta@marvell.com" <ashish.gupta@marvell.com>,
	"shallyv@marvell.com" <shallyv@marvell.com>,
	"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
	"Daly, Lee" <lee.daly@intel.com>, Sunila Sahu <ssahu@marvell.com>,
	"Trybula, ArturX" <arturx.trybula@intel.com>,
	"Dybkowski, AdamX" <adamx.dybkowski@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Luse, Paul E" <paul.e.luse@intel.com>,
	"Harris, James R" <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Cc: "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] Proposal to remove EXPERIMENTAL label from compressdev API
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:51:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <348A99DA5F5B7549AA880327E580B43589821104@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <348A99DA5F5B7549AA880327E580B435897F9FE6@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>

Hi all,
Taking into account

-          some discussions I had in Bordeaux

-          how difficult it will be to API/ABI breakage in non-experimental APIs future

-          the proposed ARM compression PMD for LZ4 - which may discover a need for API change

-          the absence of anyone crying out for the label to be removed
I'm going to defer this proposal until a later release.

Fiona


From: Trahe, Fiona
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 6:36 PM
To: akhil.goyal@nxp.com; ashish.gupta@marvell.com; shallyv@marvell.com; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Daly, Lee <lee.daly@intel.com>; Sunila Sahu <ssahu@marvell.com>; Trybula, ArturX <arturx.trybula@intel.com>; Dybkowski, AdamX <adamx.dybkowski@intel.com>; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Luse, Paul E <paul.e.luse@intel.com>; Harris, James R <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Cc: Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC] Proposal to remove EXPERIMENTAL label from compressdev API

Hi all,

Just putting it out there that the DPDK compressdev API has been available since 18.05, has had minimal change in recent releases and can be considered mature enough to have the experimental label removed.
I'd like to make this change in the 19.11 release.

Opinions?

Regards,
Fiona


      reply	other threads:[~2019-09-23 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-27 17:36 Trahe, Fiona
2019-09-23 10:51 ` Trahe, Fiona [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=348A99DA5F5B7549AA880327E580B43589821104@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
    --cc=adamx.dybkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=arturx.trybula@intel.com \
    --cc=ashish.gupta@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=james.r.harris@intel.com \
    --cc=lee.daly@intel.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=paul.e.luse@intel.com \
    --cc=shallyv@marvell.com \
    --cc=ssahu@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).