From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F5CA04DC; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:23:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E56EC8F6; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:23:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737E8C8D8 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:23:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE87A5C00B4; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 06:23:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 06:23:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= Q2/KgcP5aRCyMXPhhV917aq5j2qNj/FtY5YITr2+5Vw=; b=TV3T4GBCnhjjvRPz /YUFdYsOlvDX4dsMAXOLlqrIsnYyc0cc2wf574umAgf997vyNmg1kLF7C/X4v0QC +zSfje+SKeLm2osSB3IhFVaP7ol1KMybzeBTrEGeCi8676N3m8SwAOpK7F4xFYRx 4fxrSiy/5KitcES8LSQtM+OkI4yd9B6Jee9BP8jVEh699iCozpzZaTtEdSzlKZYh JjL97/D/A3oH4nCM3q/4jMwOPEsCBKTWLGjoE2NpiDme/99A0aRXy9swQpzkNU7o li99b77C5Von4ThCRwqno4htd69qC8PcfgbIBxJc3ipm93GnNg4FT+BCaiKk14XY 9/B/ZQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Q2/KgcP5aRCyMXPhhV917aq5j2qNj/FtY5YITr2+5 Vw=; b=dlDJ8Boqe1u24E2fbAQQeQSYa6mx//JunkeYM0r0rr0jRnW6LSfMXLyIt E2yOPWMwwmKyCGh/3tgxiFAoAL5ETGwVVjYJ4hJoH56MmDi5RrlW3dZnFoLpI7Iz ZHbVdhRnL/CTTIvE+V0Yr56aGxi0ReA3yP7yo/viVcOYhBalKP5nJe7NYgOSvRNG 87Gh1ThyuJ6wrf/HA3c2hj7CrtBZ4Sdrc4BbBZY6MSWTAlWUJq9DBuz2Qv7SCR7+ od7gUZlzXe7epyTyN6DUPGpevXp774ixQ5791AUWRyE6c1xDi8KbTulYCPgiBTS9 WGq2xYf5au8gJAnUbiz4AAeRz+53g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrjedugddvkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CB168328005D; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 06:23:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" , dev@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:23:25 +0200 Message-ID: <3493785.58b1KVbXsB@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200914094058.16b715d5@hermes.lan> References: <20200904221143.19744-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <6a912a3a-81c2-7740-5f89-815d2e5fba5d@intel.com> <20200914094058.16b715d5@hermes.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/rte_malloc: add alloc_size() attribute to allocation functions X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 14/09/2020 18:40, Stephen Hemminger: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:35:58 +0100 > "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote: > > > > * Replacement function for calloc(), using huge-page memory. Memory area is > > > @@ -239,9 +243,9 @@ rte_zmalloc_socket(const char *type, size_t size, unsigned align, int socket); > > > * align is not a power of two). > > > * - Otherwise, the pointer to the allocated object. > > > */ > > > -__rte_malloc > > > void * > > > > Where did this come from? > > It was on an earlier patch, I based this on an abandoned tree, will rebase on main. Please could you rebase?