From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EFD42A5C; Thu, 4 May 2023 12:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF80D41144; Thu, 4 May 2023 12:11:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11FF410DC for ; Thu, 4 May 2023 12:10:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1683195058; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=V7E+oHgthurY7XRTk/3eRHTA+jx75Sy1CXXR5et5cec=; b=XidTYayrf503R+955jwLX9EM3l5ha3oQhRnvl/Idk5LB4xslpzNYT1uCt9NxE/J4TV4anE msI1QmPvoN6g6G9+SOBbYhkE37n0pfPB3v7mJWDRG7XE4YUi72FxF4V91hHOg08HBLRo1l SCKnufsMpJ1d7ix/KV8bJPZ9BkCI3UY= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-47-yjhFrEawOByTDn7U5CygRQ-1; Thu, 04 May 2023 06:10:57 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yjhFrEawOByTDn7U5CygRQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f33f8ffa37so1196335e9.2 for ; Thu, 04 May 2023 03:10:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683195056; x=1685787056; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:from:references:cc:to :content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=V7E+oHgthurY7XRTk/3eRHTA+jx75Sy1CXXR5et5cec=; b=evxe76pdru1w3MVqZyFt7kp00c0vQ4/M979PngkTI0uYTUHH0I7DhXGuBbJdwI3HRw XhOKs6xhjKVhGRlr1fmmBzO871NeTF7XbNGJrKpSt2udprb9anKPcoS/jy5tsihzPlzA WSGvA7y1UqsS/QN0CY7szSUg02bGe7+OB5YZ0eNxEuPBSZQt3RwKjW853EQiLDJuExT1 P64T1nOkHpmkty0nmUaWxYDy8bc4ZbKVq2monO/xsNg+pGOjwRengyibabhcqc0OfF1j O6O/hNwDSthZxRPZRfY6abE3wvQGJl3VrVr234DcwUGY5+tzXyy04dakJRzD4RHWUcvo S+1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDz/iQ8yMzs0/AyB0w2dr+6V+JAk1xlF1gnYhr8W7lQNoj6M0zPB PopEeJHEYWpvDXRBoUBTdOAD+lkwgnr27548p+kWgHosADhkC4rEhRM8/LkEDlLLpAkIyQtRZW2 +kXE= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f607:0:b0:3f1:91fc:564 with SMTP id w7-20020a1cf607000000b003f191fc0564mr16564906wmc.7.1683195056464; Thu, 04 May 2023 03:10:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6F/7P6Th/pIiTOQRw+NqpiI3Pa0DbPCo2TuFsE+iVrDpuSaJEWiHTGrcuzGINnXiMMOJbB1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f607:0:b0:3f1:91fc:564 with SMTP id w7-20020a1cf607000000b003f191fc0564mr16564879wmc.7.1683195056127; Thu, 04 May 2023 03:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.36] ([78.19.110.151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 16-20020a05600c021000b003f198dfbbfcsm4429387wmi.19.2023.05.04.03.10.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 May 2023 03:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <34c532ab-e66c-af60-2c79-40a6f16bd7ed@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 11:10:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 To: "Xu, HailinX" , "stable@dpdk.org" Cc: "Stokes, Ian" , "Mcnamara, John" , Luca Boccassi , "Xu, Qian Q" , Thomas Monjalon , "Peng, Yuan" , "Chen, Zhaoyan" , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <20230406113734.261672-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> <630da282-4ce1-4e2c-b6f7-7c333c51da2c@redhat.com> From: Kevin Traynor Subject: Re: 21.11.4 patches review and test In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 04/05/2023 03:13, Xu, HailinX wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kevin Traynor >> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 5:35 PM >> To: Xu, HailinX ; stable@dpdk.org >> Cc: Stokes, Ian ; Mcnamara, John >> ; Luca Boccassi ; Xu, Qian Q >> ; Thomas Monjalon ; Peng, >> Yuan ; Chen, Zhaoyan ; >> dev@dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: 21.11.4 patches review and test >> >> On 20/04/2023 11:32, Kevin Traynor wrote: >>> On 20/04/2023 03:40, Xu, HailinX wrote: >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Xu, HailinX >>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 2:13 PM >>>>> To: Kevin Traynor ; stable@dpdk.org >>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe >> ; >>>>> Ali Alnubani ; Walker, Benjamin >>>>> ; David Christensen >>>>> ; Hemant Agrawal >> ; >>>>> Stokes, Ian ; Jerin Jacob >>>>> ; Mcnamara, John ; >>>>> Ju-Hyoung Lee ; Luca Boccassi >>>>> ; Pei Zhang ; Xu, Qian Q >>>>> ; Raslan Darawsheh ; >> Thomas >>>>> Monjalon ; yanghliu@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan >>>>> ; Chen, Zhaoyan >>>>> Subject: RE: 21.11.4 patches review and test >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Kevin Traynor >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 7:38 PM >>>>>> To: stable@dpdk.org >>>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe >>>>>> ; Ali Alnubani >>>>>> ; Walker, Benjamin ; >>>>>> David Christensen ; Hemant Agrawal >>>>>> ; Stokes, Ian ; Jerin >>>>>> Jacob ; Mcnamara, John >>>>>> ; Ju-Hyoung Lee ; >>>>>> Kevin Traynor ; Luca Boccassi >>>>>> ; Pei Zhang ; Xu, Qian Q >>>>>> ; Raslan Darawsheh ; >>>>> Thomas >>>>>> Monjalon ; yanghliu@redhat.com; Peng, Yuan >>>>>> ; Chen, Zhaoyan >>>>>> Subject: 21.11.4 patches review and test >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.4. >>>>>> >>>>>> The planned date for the final release is 25th April. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and >>>>>> report any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the >>>>>> final release the fixes and reported validations will be added to the >> release notes. >>>>>> >>>>>> A release candidate tarball can be found at: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.4-rc1 >>>>>> >>>>>> These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo: >>>>>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kevin >>>>> >>>>> HI All, >>>>> >>>>> Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.4-rc1 >>>>> validation test rate is 85%. No critical issue is found. >>>>> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. >>>>> New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues >>>>> 1. >> pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: >>>>> performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets >>>>> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 -- no fix yet >>>>> 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under >> investigating >>>>> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing >>>>> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with >>>>> latest GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as >>>>> Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, RHEL8.4, >>>>> FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc. >>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including >>>>> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including >>>>> VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package >>>>> Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible >>>>> Descriptor, etc. >>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including >>>>> PF/VF single core performance test, etc. >>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic >>>>> test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. >>>>> - On going. >>>>> >>>>> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing >>>>> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as >>>>> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf >>>>> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. >>>>> - All test done. found bug1. >>>>> * Cryptodev: >>>>> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API >>>>> testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. >>>>> - Execution rate is 90%. found bug2. >>>>> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput >>>>> Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. >>>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Xu, Hailin >>>> Update the test status for Intel part. completed dpdk21.11.4-rc1 all >> validation. No critical issue is found. >>> >>> Hi. Thanks for testing. >>> >>>> 2 new bugs are found, 1 new issue is under confirming by Intel Dev. >>>> New bugs: --20.11.8-rc1 also has these two issues >>>> 1. >> pvp_qemu_multi_paths_port_restart:perf_pvp_qemu_vector_rx_mac: >> performance drop about 23.5% when send small packets >>>> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212 --not fix yet, Only the >>>> specified platform exists >>> >>> Do you know which patch caaused the regression? I'm not fully clear >>> from the Bz for 20.11. The backported patch ID'd as root cause [0] in >>> 20.11 is in the previous releases of 20.11 (and 21.11). >>> >>> Trying to understand because then it would have shown in testing for >>> previous releases. Or is this a new test introduced for latest LTS >>> releases? and if so, what is the baseline performance based on? >>> >>> [0] >>> commit 1c9a7fba5c90e0422b517404499ed106f647bcff >>> Author: Mattias Rönnblom >>> Date: Mon Jul 11 14:11:32 2022 +0200 >>> >>> net: accept unaligned data in checksum routines >>> >>>> 2. some of the virtio tests are failing: -- Intel dev is under >>>> investigating >>> >>> ok, thank you. >>> >> >> Hi, it was mentioned in a separate mail that the performance drop issue was >> not the same as 20.11. >> >> Is there any update on that and the failing virtio tests ? Is there a regression >> introduced since in 21.11.4 ? > > Found bad commit id: > commit c41493361c87e730459ead9311c68528eb0874aa > Author: Boleslav Stankevich > Date:   Fri Mar 3 14:19:29 2023 +0300 >     net/virtio: deduce IP length for TSO checksum > > We try this issue on 3 different platforms > Performance drop only found on Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8280M CPU @ 2.70GHz CPU. > Ok, thanks for reporting. This commit was also in 23.03 and 20.11.8 so not sure if they were tested on this platform? This commit fixes a functional issue, so I don't think it should be removed unless it is critical issue. There's no update on other performance report. Release is already 1 week overdue, is there critical issues that we should hold release for? thanks, Kevin. > Regards, > Xu, Hailin > >> >> thanks, >> Kevin, >> >>> Kevin. >>> >>>> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing >>>> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest >> GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as >>>> Ubuntu20.04, Ubuntu22.04, Fedora35, Fedora37, RHEL8.6, RHEL8.4, >> FreeBSD13.1, SUSE15, CentOS7.9, etc. >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>> * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including >> RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>> * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including >> VF-RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>> * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package >> Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible >> Descriptor, etc. >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>> * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF >> single core performance test, etc. >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>> * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - >> QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>> >>>> # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing >>>> * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as >> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf >> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc. >>>> - All test done. found bug1. >>>> * Cryptodev: >>>> *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API >> testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. >>>> - All test done. found bug2. >>>> *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput >> Performance/Cryptodev Latency, etc. >>>> - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Xu, Hailin >>>> >>> >