From: Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 3/5] bpf: add a test for BPF ELF load
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 16:38:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34f3ae46b0744bcea63bd4031cb8d4a5@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251109200854.45942-4-stephen@networkplumber.org>
> diff --git a/app/test/bpf/load.c b/app/test/bpf/load.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..a4d3d61d7a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/app/test/bpf/load.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> + *
> + * BPF program for testing rte_bpf_elf_load
> + */
> +
> +typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
> +typedef unsigned short uint16_t;
> +typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
> +typedef unsigned long uint64_t;
> +
> +/* Match the structures from test_bpf.c */
> +struct dummy_offset {
> + uint64_t u64;
> + uint32_t u32;
> + uint16_t u16;
> + uint8_t u8;
> +} __attribute__((packed));
> +
> +struct dummy_vect8 {
> + struct dummy_offset in[8];
> + struct dummy_offset out[8];
> +};
> +
> +/* External function declaration - provided by test via xsym */
> +extern void dummy_func1(const void *p, uint32_t *v32, uint64_t *v64);
> +
> +/*
> + * Test BPF function that will be loaded from ELF
> + * This function is compiled version of code used in test_call1
> + */
Thank you for this clarification, now it makes more sense why we use these structs.
// snip
> diff --git a/app/test/bpf/meson.build b/app/test/bpf/meson.build
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..b4f54aa976
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/app/test/bpf/meson.build
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +# Copyright 2025 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> +
> +bpf_test_hdrs = [ ]
> +
> +# use clang to compile to bpf
> +clang_supports_bpf = false
> +clang = find_program('clang', required: false)
> +if clang.found()
> + clang_supports_bpf = run_command(clang, '-target', 'bpf', '--print-supported-cpus',
> + check: false).returncode() == 0
> +endif
> +
> +if not clang_supports_bpf
> + message('app/test_bpf: no BPF load tests missing clang BPF support')
> + subdir_done()
> +
> +endif
> +
> +xxd = find_program('xxd', required: false)
> +if not xxd.found()
> + message('app/test_bpf: missing xxd required to convert object to array')
> + subdir_done()
> +endif
> +
> +# BPF compiler flags
> +bpf_cflags = [ '-O2', '-target', 'bpf', '-g', '-c']
> +
> +# Enable test in test_bpf.c
> +cflags += '-DTEST_BPF_ELF_LOAD'
Sorry for not noticing it earlier, we probably want these tests depend on
RTE_LIBRTE_BPF_ELF, otherwise they fail when libelf is not installed.
// snip
> +static int
> +test_bpf_elf_load(void)
> +{
> + static const char test_section[] = "call1";
> + uint8_t tbuf[sizeof(struct dummy_vect8)];
I still think alignment may become an issue here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-30 17:34 [PATCH 0/5] bpf enhancements Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-30 17:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] bpf: add allocation annotations to functions Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-30 17:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] bpf: use rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-30 17:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] bpf: add a test for BPF ELF load Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-30 17:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] bpf: add test for rx and tx filtering Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-30 17:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] bpf: remove use of vla Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-31 11:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] bpf enhancements Marat Khalili
2025-10-31 16:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-31 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] BPF enhancements Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-31 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] bpf: add allocation annotations to functions Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-31 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] bpf: use bulk free on filtered packets Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-31 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] bpf: add a test for BPF ELF load Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-31 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] bpf: add test for Rx and Tx filtering Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-31 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] bpf: remove use of VLA Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-01 18:04 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] BPF enhancements Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-01 18:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] bpf: add allocation annotations to functions Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-02 21:42 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-11-01 18:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] bpf: use bulk free on filtered packets Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-01 18:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] bpf: add a test for BPF ELF load Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-01 18:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] bpf: add test for Rx and Tx filtering Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-01 18:04 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] bpf: remove use of VLA Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-03 9:21 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-11-04 16:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] BPF enhancements Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-04 16:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] bpf: add allocation annotations to functions Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-07 17:35 ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-04 16:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] bpf: use bulk free on filtered packets Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-06 7:25 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-11-07 17:36 ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-04 16:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] bpf: add a test for BPF ELF load Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-07 17:33 ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-07 17:45 ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-08 1:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-10 15:34 ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-08 1:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-04 16:07 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] bpf: add test for Rx and Tx filtering Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-07 17:30 ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-08 1:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-10 15:43 ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-04 16:07 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] bpf: replace use of VLA Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-06 7:26 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-11-07 17:36 ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-09 20:07 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] BPF cleanup and tests Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-09 20:07 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] bpf: add allocation annotations to functions Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-09 20:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] bpf: use bulk free on filtered packets Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-09 20:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] bpf: add a test for BPF ELF load Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-10 16:38 ` Marat Khalili [this message]
2025-11-10 17:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-10 17:17 ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-10 17:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-11 9:46 ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-09 20:07 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] bpf: add test for Rx and Tx filtering Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-11 9:46 ` Marat Khalili
2025-11-09 20:07 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] bpf: replace use of VLA Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-11 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] BPF cleanup and tests Thomas Monjalon
2025-11-11 22:55 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] BPF tests Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-11 22:55 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] bpf: add a test for BPF ELF load Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-11 22:55 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] bpf: add test for Rx and Tx filtering Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34f3ae46b0744bcea63bd4031cb8d4a5@huawei.com \
--to=marat.khalili@huawei.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).