From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BCD5683 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 15:45:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id f193so33744749wmg.0 for ; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 06:45:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x3IjaHpOk3pHEB06+bE2zx+iMcGSx5vFcqAZ1Ou/k4E=; b=BjDmf1ocP2NBWgteA31gDfZIMg2hUwHy75egujoQFdsB26mS+qyEAUmGQXgl92J4nP V5Rl2gaR6tb6i5deI5C/gTD3doory4R5goF8u0cYaJR3WyBbUjti3i3yQHLFJOEuH9Tj bel/b0iXzsAVz5sJYuE7AlobImvk40q9+onZZnFpNpBh0ovo87zjCRMlmtflz4irvwd3 vLoU0pYXAr6VkYRCD4WtV3Se2Xxf7eg+QupKtjyAXXVKqDgNNzKd0MwJnmm+XMYAERsU LXXxo1el6T0zc2SbgLVLwVkG7U15YBXyP18o64pOKS2wgxDxLwU9XP5SNImMcj9gI33f y6Gg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x3IjaHpOk3pHEB06+bE2zx+iMcGSx5vFcqAZ1Ou/k4E=; b=KgYnRXBvJVz4tJPcl9Hga/SYZ7+X+5bEwcSxbpMd4JKu/PYo7PMozCCvAjtDrSha9E jrAQ49yvCCxfw9QrwynAJ3EDNzwVB7GHcAgcVNrZ3KBQxczWJeXVyCchma78lmSrgMuj lNc+ICZ42hEJabbypxbpnEF12Nkb0vhjrqvURfZzY34FdPqaLINJkXppHGIW/eg/0oiC tnXTII+A7YMcelsOqXbm2+FZfikCC6aS2ZlL2qirhGlwxzkTXY0ekWIz4L8Hbfxtzka3 sCgZPV39+21m0UqLAX4vcqp0mn4GJXqoE73WS86uLJS0lbBdkZ7Nq5SCn75yfhi2viK0 1oHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnNjN/NfAJQ+h/r0FrXSWw2UdldbMyhPpkCFbBMSzxdhXQT8Vt8ksnUChu0RMcGBP70 X-Received: by 10.194.146.195 with SMTP id te3mr19506707wjb.51.1475847905915; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 06:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id vs7sm19824823wjb.10.2016.10.07.06.45.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Oct 2016 06:45:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Shreyansh Jain Cc: david.marchand@6wind.com, dev@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:45:04 +0200 Message-ID: <3500403.rczxDexAsB@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1475847187-28967-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> References: <1475847187-28967-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eal/drivers: prefix driver REGISTER macros with EAL X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 13:45:06 -0000 2016-10-07 19:03, Shreyansh Jain: > DRIVER_REGISTER_PCI -> EAL_REGISTER_PCI > DRIVER_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE -> EAL_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE Why not RTE_ prefix instead of EAL_? Why 3 patches? As there is no specific comment in each, I think you can squash.