From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90CB7CCD for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 08:53:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6704320BBC; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 02:53:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 02:53:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=9ll3PvWxDUzP3oo 19Txl0pqGz9L08k2vqG2tdT0wcVM=; b=oo0TTZgaa4sBezdc6zHsVn08OaJ0V4R e5OakYO0RIqiNSCJXgCmZoF+y47HmABSiZqG9ufxNY3GrzVaitEuAZUm0vKmlch+ HwTJTXAlfSWkpfzyuL4aoJKBzijYjkLuUe9Egv4SEFeyUBORQRz+rm2GXBPwbypZ Ewq7PN1lTd2s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=9ll3PvWxDUzP3oo19Txl0pqGz9L08k2vqG2tdT0wcVM=; b=ENWF5RZl dAwXN1VtMuBembm0x3N2bbtvzNT2/Yl+u7uQqq16U954eaOHGqfzZspVs+dLrK80 F5mSDBZzEVTp0cQf+KU/ZS1uFCGKoqmxVSaDV5khS3w/0An9iPg01ve3pJ54/hQt juJo++Bzwlx8uKMbAaUzaTY7NH2CZUQ+ZT3aPCj9SY7l9XgcrC0+sBsGuh80YsMD plk08diR25pLzAqEyIQ8vXqTpzaQM54oNn5DgLKFH9xRJX/vpl+vQe+8DFVaEwGb aHFNV7tJFBJ29xNm7tSAEoeAOeQADa4wZM5nVaZnROkqCBOLuApBZnT8yxj7J6LY K2z92PYd267taw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: WJkUjHMwkGm2MYlBvAZjk5U7RGrFjoLILE0U62HB7Op6 1506063215 Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 19D5824570; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 02:53:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Shreyansh Jain Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 08:53:34 +0200 Message-ID: <3516429.Zj0nEJyuAA@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <1499179471-19145-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> <6152858.vxEEUDssMq@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 21/40] maintainers: claim ownership of DPAA Mempool driver X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 06:53:36 -0000 22/09/2017 08:47, Shreyansh Jain: > On Friday 22 September 2017 03:26 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 23/08/2017 16:11, Shreyansh Jain: > >> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >> @@ -409,6 +409,7 @@ NXP dpaa > >> M: Hemant Agrawal > >> M: Shreyansh Jain > >> F: drivers/bus/dpaa/ > >> +F: drivers/mempool/dpaa/ > >> F: doc/guides/nics/dpaa.rst > >> F: doc/guides/nics/features/dpaa.ini > > > > This kind of patch can be squashed in the first patch introducing > > this new directory. > > > > Then the patch script (devtools/check-git-log.sh) reports error - I > think. That is the primary reason I split them across multiple patches. > You sure that doesn't matter? Which error? To be clear I suggest to squash with patch 19 where drivers/mempool/dpaa/Makefile is introduced.