DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>
Cc: orika@nvidia.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
	andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, dev@dpdk.org,
	ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, xiaoyun.li@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action and item
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:06:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3521936.dDA8s7yrex@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1618595649-157464-2-git-send-email-bingz@nvidia.com>

16/04/2021 19:54, Bing Zhao:
> +/**
> + * The packet is valid after conntrack checking.
> + */
> +#define RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_PKT_STATE_VALID RTE_BIT32(0)
> +/**
> + * The state of the connection is changed.
> + */
> +#define RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_PKT_STATE_CHANGED RTE_BIT32(1)
> +/**
> + * Error is detected on this packet for this connection and
> + * an invalid state is set.
> + */
> +#define RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_PKT_STATE_INVALID RTE_BIT32(2)
> +/**
> + * The HW connection tracking module is disabled.
> + * It can be due to application command or an invalid state.
> + */
> +#define RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_PKT_STATE_DISABLED RTE_BIT32(3)
> +/**
> + * The packet contains some bad field(s) and cannot continue
> + * with the conntrack module checking.
> + */
> +#define RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_PKT_STATE_BAD RTE_BIT32(4)

I like it better now that all bits have the same prefix, thanks.

> +enum rte_flow_conntrack_state {
> +	/**< SYN-ACK packet was seen. */
> +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_SYN_RECV,
> +	/**< 3-way handshake was done. */
> +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_ESTABLISHED,
> +	/**< First FIN packet was received to close the connection. */
> +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_FIN_WAIT,
> +	/**< First FIN was ACKed. */
> +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_CLOSE_WAIT,
> +	/**< Second FIN was received, waiting for the last ACK. */
> +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_LAST_ACK,
> +	/**< Second FIN was ACKed, connection was closed. */
> +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_TIME_WAIT,
> +};

These doxygen comments should not have "<" in them,
because they are "before".

[...]
> +	/** No TCP check will be done except the state change. */
> +	uint32_t liberal_mode:1;
> +	/**<The current state of this connection. */

s,/**<,/** ,

> +	enum rte_flow_conntrack_state state;

Looks good overrall, thanks.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-19 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-18  7:30 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] " Bing Zhao
2021-03-22 15:16 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-07  7:43   ` Bing Zhao
2021-03-23 23:27 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-07  2:41   ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-10 13:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-15 16:24   ` Ori Kam
2021-04-15 16:44     ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-15 16:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-15 16:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 10:49       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-16 18:18         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 12:41       ` Ori Kam
2021-04-16 18:05         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 21:47           ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-17  6:10             ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-17 14:54               ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-15 16:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] app/testpmd: add CLI for conntrack Bing Zhao
2021-04-16  8:46       ` Ori Kam
2021-04-16 18:20         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 17:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action and item Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 18:30       ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-19 14:08         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 16:21           ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 14:06       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-04-19 16:13         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/testpmd: add CLI for conntrack Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc: update " Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 18:22       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-16 18:30       ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-19 17:28         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 17:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action and item Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 17:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 17:33       ` Ori Kam
2021-04-19 17:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] app/testpmd: add CLI for conntrack Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 17:35       ` Ori Kam
2021-04-19 17:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] doc: update " Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 17:32       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 17:37       ` Ori Kam
2021-04-19 17:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action and item Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 17:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 18:07       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 23:29         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-19 17:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] app/testpmd: add CLI for conntrack Bing Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3521936.dDA8s7yrex@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=bingz@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).