From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6AFC350 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:10:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so144521426wib.1 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:10:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=SEzR1WRgd6XpB6+z1L9hYzPAZAVtnFhwVJYHmQjdHTE=; b=V2Mbps/6K/eVf8u/3FiVbZgaTeGjOrORSRbOBLqUcBGMkKYld3NhkOdCatA50pSXrr 3XB2JaHoMojECjmBQccRqGzBtXY7jRrgKYgZLkiUlpd9V+HJecbqKDvaqfM4xvJcdceM fQQSEgaPdaKyj9ISvrUxP+a50zmVgCxh+JemPnrXirCreJW9nNsYvVWxZe7KhWmLIl3U QAfhZm8WuHLJNRAwUOJtZfT6ps5Y/GkfTr+d6Oh2GdA6WGENZYlcHpBylRdqwJqqPKyr YApIEb1DVIYmRDRB1l+RqBxgXWsM/USnJdOIHkBPzwiLirqnUDmqCvRcGGMgHr7LBH+l vGlw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlsLGQE8jsvO5gMowedDaS+UJ7JjtvgT0qwjcOuB/HgjIMRc6cbabpnvovJsvsTRSVtmh/a X-Received: by 10.180.39.65 with SMTP id n1mr23940421wik.59.1438621805221; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ma4sm23816500wjb.38.2015.08.03.10.10.04 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:10:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Zhang, Helin" Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 19:08:50 +0200 Message-ID: <3527832.xFxZ2Khfjf@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1436860647-5862-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> <2596501.YiU0Cqygmx@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] examples: remove l3fwd-vf example X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:10:05 -0000 2015-08-03 17:02, Zhang, Helin: > I don't think so, as l3fwd cannot support all cases quite well at this moment. > Can we targeting to do that in R2.2? OK, thanks > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 9:55 AM > > To: Zhang, Helin > > Cc: Liu, Yong; Cao, Waterman; dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] examples: remove l3fwd-vf example > > > > Any news? > > Can we remove it from version 2.1? > > > > 2015-07-22 14:51, Zhang, Helin: > > > Marvin/Waterman > > > > > > Could you help to check if l3fwd is good enough for all cases (1g/10/40g, PF and > > VF, single queue/multiple queue)? > > > We aim to remove l3fwd-vf to reduce an example application which is not so > > necessary. > > > Thank you! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Helin