From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FA4A04C1; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:51:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D782A5D; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:51:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.224]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B274825D9; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:51:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322575803F7; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:51:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:51:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= 1cpvQ0gQMPyA8Rx2EVY0qfqBxwq3RxibQsGoqHOYLmU=; b=RYpPJb3QtJaDljdC Ev4q5c9hK689otAuIpdkLZQ5dTPczsK7Qzu8Wtg3pJK55lN3v4asYS+Kmz71mQ73 oJcBEpA6ow+Dy4WE/c12T8XSF32l7fms6GLyBEg7fBZ1cq+hosNgdSOZrwxQx3tt JqocTUpgV2Nh1N4ISuvOkOZjj0rY4GxzVo3MWbjso6IZJU6FG5FW6Eme0TXWjEu/ UGilKjyDKbL4PBfcSwsGds6D94tehOfq8/1mXk0d6Rfpc4DDH6Pio1CHFZsqZ+Gs D6Wfirdt5HvXCiHOgCtsPPcWZwVEhk5EomIzLEDa72Qp5zzee+IE0xndTcP7NbHL VcBwAQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=1cpvQ0gQMPyA8Rx2EVY0qfqBxwq3RxibQsGoqHOYL mU=; b=a0iK6zYSx0jej/5uh2IkURU+NkreEFWu9wscDpgursqX1c1QpfIYi9po7 yhARw8RUJfj3wSrCs8AZaWxhdo2gbNUgJ1N9P3lWQmwPalnKtODnlyKF2mqlQc6q RYQP7IHRDkZPAlLN3ZzKaWZCiRqjB0UK6efQENd9/niwa/Vk64thUf9CU9Kp4b66 /DN+I1LNeGzg2B0ZUKjEXS6E5QdwVJlfTPsD6KyDROyxZ7fakObLfc5tIgfK/uG+ eOgJNEAhMd6JXoeqXyKWr9hpBqbP/TDi0g+RHp3Cgm2Q7hfSb1MahpyQKc6EjD97 u07VpHh8I+2vE4tN7V7GFByHQdVPg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrkeekgdehjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeehteff vdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeelfedriedrudegle druddugeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm pehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (114.149.6.93.rev.sfr.net [93.6.149.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7D297328006A; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:50:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Dybkowski, AdamX" , "Trahe, Fiona" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Zhang, Roy Fan" , "stephen@networkplumber.org" , "Burakov, Anatoly" , "bluca@debian.org" , Akhil Goyal , "Richardson, Bruce" , "Mcnamara, John" , "Trahe, Fiona" , techboard@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:50:57 +0200 Message-ID: <3567036.vTBxH0KFj1@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20200727094113.2849-1-adamx.dybkowski@intel.com> <5056132.gDXpgoo2J5@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: scheduler API deprecation notice X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 10/08/2020 13:49, Trahe, Fiona: > Sorry about that Thomas, Akhil, we should have chased up acks sooner. > > Given the proposed content of the patch, and the similar changes that are recommended and agreed > throughout DPDK do you think an exception can be made and that this change can get into 20.11 even > without the deprecation notice being in 20.08? That's a question for techboard. PS: please avoid top-posting > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 10/08/2020 11:47, Dybkowski, AdamX: > > > I see there are 3 ACKs: original (see the commit message) from Fan, then Thomas and Akhil. > > > This page: http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=11317 > > > also shows it has 3 ACKs. > > > > Sorry I missed initial ack. > > > > > Can I ask why it didn't go into 20.08 then? > > > > Because it was completed late, I missed and nobody replied. > > > > In general, I would like more support in last days of release, > > to avoid such miss. > > > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon > > > > 06/08/2020 19:18, Akhil Goyal: > > > > > > 27/07/2020 11:41, Adam Dybkowski: > > > > > > > This patch adds a deprecation notice about upcoming changes in > > > > > > > public API of the Scheduler PMD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Dybkowski > > > > > > > Acked-by: Fan Zhang > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > +* scheduler: The functions > > > > > > > +``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_slave_attach``, > > > > > > > + ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_slave_detach`` and > > > > > > > + ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_slaves_get`` will be replaced in > > > > > > > +20.11 by > > > > > > > + ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_worker_attach``, > > > > > > > + ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_worker_detach`` and > > > > > > > + ``rte_cryptodev_scheduler_workers_get`` accordingly. > > > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon > > > > > > > > > > > I wonder how this patch got missed. > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal > > > > > > > > Sorry it is missing an ack. > > > > > >