* [DPDK/ethdev Bug 1782] net/zxdh shadowed declarations
@ 2025-08-27 23:01 bugzilla
2025-10-10 14:47 ` Kevin Traynor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2025-08-27 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2677 bytes --]
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1782
Bug ID: 1782
Summary: net/zxdh shadowed declarations
Product: DPDK
Version: 25.07
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: ethdev
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: stephen@networkplumber.org
Target Milestone: ---
Compiling DPDK with -Wshadow causes additional warnings about potential issues
caused by duplicate shadow declarations. One driver with issues is net/zxdh.
[1528/3627] Compiling C object
drivers/libtmp_rte_net_zxdh.a.p/net_zxdh_zxdh_msg.c.o
In file included from ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.h:14,
from ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:17:
../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c: In function ‘zxdh_add_vf_mac_table’:
../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_common.h:94:18: warning: declaration of ‘addr’ shadows
a previous local [-Wshadow]
94 | uint8_t *addr = ZXDH_ADDR_OF(typ, p, fld); \
| ^~~~
../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:1441:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘ZXDH_SET’
1441 | ZXDH_SET(mac_reply_msg, mac_reply_msg_addr, mac_flag,
ZXDH_EEXIST_MAC_FLAG);
| ^~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:1428:32: note: shadowed declaration is here
1428 | struct rte_ether_addr *addr = &mac_filter->mac;
| ^~~~
../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_common.h:94:18: warning: declaration of ‘addr’ shadows
a previous local [-Wshadow]
94 | uint8_t *addr = ZXDH_ADDR_OF(typ, p, fld); \
| ^~~~
../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:1462:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘ZXDH_SET’
1462 | ZXDH_SET(msg_reply_body, reply_body, flag, ZXDH_REPS_SUCC);
| ^~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:1428:32: note: shadowed declaration is here
1428 | struct rte_ether_addr *addr = &mac_filter->mac;
| ^~~~
../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_common.h:94:18: warning: declaration of ‘addr’ shadows
a previous local [-Wshadow]
94 | uint8_t *addr = ZXDH_ADDR_OF(typ, p, fld); \
| ^~~~
../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:1468:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘ZXDH_SET’
1468 | ZXDH_SET(msg_reply_body, reply_body, flag, ZXDH_REPS_FAIL);
| ^~~~~~~~
../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:1428:32: note: shadowed declaration is here
1428 | struct rte_ether_addr *addr =
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4549 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [DPDK/ethdev Bug 1782] net/zxdh shadowed declarations
2025-08-27 23:01 [DPDK/ethdev Bug 1782] net/zxdh shadowed declarations bugzilla
@ 2025-10-10 14:47 ` Kevin Traynor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Traynor @ 2025-10-10 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wang.junlong1, shan.lijie; +Cc: dev, bugzilla
On 28/08/2025 00:01, bugzilla@dpdk.org wrote:
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1782
>
> Bug ID: 1782
> Summary: net/zxdh shadowed declarations
> Product: DPDK
> Version: 25.07
> Hardware: All
> OS: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
> Severity: normal
> Priority: Normal
> Component: ethdev
> Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
> Reporter: stephen@networkplumber.org
> Target Milestone: ---
>
> Compiling DPDK with -Wshadow causes additional warnings about potential issues
> caused by duplicate shadow declarations. One driver with issues is net/zxdh.
>
> [1528/3627] Compiling C object
> drivers/libtmp_rte_net_zxdh.a.p/net_zxdh_zxdh_msg.c.o
> In file included from ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.h:14,
> from ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:17:
> ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c: In function ‘zxdh_add_vf_mac_table’:
> ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_common.h:94:18: warning: declaration of ‘addr’ shadows
> a previous local [-Wshadow]
> 94 | uint8_t *addr = ZXDH_ADDR_OF(typ, p, fld); \
> | ^~~~
> ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:1441:17: note: in expansion of macro ‘ZXDH_SET’
> 1441 | ZXDH_SET(mac_reply_msg, mac_reply_msg_addr, mac_flag,
> ZXDH_EEXIST_MAC_FLAG);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:1428:32: note: shadowed declaration is here
> 1428 | struct rte_ether_addr *addr = &mac_filter->mac;
> | ^~~~
> ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_common.h:94:18: warning: declaration of ‘addr’ shadows
> a previous local [-Wshadow]
> 94 | uint8_t *addr = ZXDH_ADDR_OF(typ, p, fld); \
> | ^~~~
> ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:1462:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘ZXDH_SET’
> 1462 | ZXDH_SET(msg_reply_body, reply_body, flag, ZXDH_REPS_SUCC);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:1428:32: note: shadowed declaration is here
> 1428 | struct rte_ether_addr *addr = &mac_filter->mac;
> | ^~~~
> ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_common.h:94:18: warning: declaration of ‘addr’ shadows
> a previous local [-Wshadow]
> 94 | uint8_t *addr = ZXDH_ADDR_OF(typ, p, fld); \
> | ^~~~
> ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:1468:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘ZXDH_SET’
> 1468 | ZXDH_SET(msg_reply_body, reply_body, flag, ZXDH_REPS_FAIL);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/net/zxdh/zxdh_msg.c:1428:32: note: shadowed declaration is here
> 1428 | struct rte_ether_addr *addr =
>
Hello Junlong and Lijie,
fyi above. Can you register in dpdk bugzilla (https://bugs.dpdk.org/) ?
Then I can make you aware of any reported issues without having to send
separate emails.
thanks,
Kevin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-10 14:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-27 23:01 [DPDK/ethdev Bug 1782] net/zxdh shadowed declarations bugzilla
2025-10-10 14:47 ` Kevin Traynor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).