From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609AEA0547; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:29:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB1940683; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:29:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-109-mta73.mxroute.com (mail-109-mta73.mxroute.com [136.175.109.73]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDDC4067A for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:29:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from filter004.mxroute.com ([149.28.56.236] filter004.mxroute.com) (Authenticated sender: mN4UYu2MZsgR) by mail-109-mta73.mxroute.com (ZoneMTA) with ESMTPSA id 17a3d915efd0002d34.002 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:29:35 +0000 X-Zone-Loop: 3dee0b109cd0f3eeea2a6ebaf633a55180aa245eaa88 X-Originating-IP: [149.28.56.236] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ashroe.eu; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID: Subject:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date :Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post: List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=yDaHYAZ/dpScF5llmn5aarzTHPraY+GihT3/iJ7DrIg=; b=E pbe3D+nNPlNdGfn6P+XZ12xRBEmBMdfx9gvoN8OZG9z/nCDzM13f4YTOpzFRDgZUNwadQsSVzKFUy ms3f1P9O0/He8Pa+NW+abS/wv0iaWt7jogDlNx/Gx0DGn5Ooa7XKPTOGEExWwN1JxfTnWGHneE+fQ l08daU6/cZ3fncgms+t5VMSNZWeMRW2Dk/3+/uQGWXqXvFusJybOfYtGICyrW8+ELqMHNTUPrzVGG FgZbosL2SswkRXHmAkuKIbaBbhqadMBMT5bCjKHO2tZFQbBaKyaCZfkB6DcH2pRg/rU7i3kzAtWF8 m8pkIWtRAyFo4+kesEBkC35cSPOIyVNyQ==; To: Olivier Matz , Thomas Monjalon , Stephen Hemminger , dpdk-dev From: "Kinsella, Ray" Message-ID: <35ded922-4a9b-f16e-854d-33f17e898957@ashroe.eu> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:29:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AuthUser: mdr@ashroe.eu X-Zone-Spam-Resolution: no action X-Zone-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1, required=15, tests=[ARC_NA=0, TO_DN_ALL=0, FROM_HAS_DN=0, RCPT_COUNT_THREE=0, MIME_GOOD=-0.1, FROM_EQ_ENVFROM=0, MIME_TRACE=0, RCVD_COUNT_ZERO=0, NEURAL_SPAM=0, MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM=0] Subject: [dpdk-dev] Experimental symbols in mbuf lib X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Oliver, The following mbuf experimental symbols are present in both v21.05 and v19.11 release. These symbols should be considered for promotion to stable as part of the v22 ABI in DPDK 21.11, as they have been experimental for >= 2yrs at this point. * rte_mbuf_check * rte_mbuf_dynfield_lookup * rte_mbuf_dynfield_register * rte_mbuf_dynfield_register_offset * rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup * rte_mbuf_dynflag_register * rte_mbuf_dynflag_register_bitnum * rte_mbuf_dyn_dump * rte_pktmbuf_copy * rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk Ray K