DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ergin, Mesut A" <mesut.a.ergin@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/i40e: fix inadvertent override of vector RX allowance
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:25:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3615B82CA151CF42A86EDDD9846A8B38C7A8C3E5@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061153385EC0@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Hi Qi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 5:42 AM
> To: Ergin, Mesut A <mesut.a.ergin@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] net/i40e: fix inadvertent override of vector RX
> allowance
> 
> Hi Mesut:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ergin, Mesut A
> > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 12:28 PM
> > To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ergin, Mesut A <mesut.a.ergin@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] net/i40e: fix inadvertent override of vector RX allowance
> >
> > When i40e_rx_vec_dev_conf_condition_check_default() determines whether
> > vector receive functions would be allowed during initialization phase, it should
> > honor previously recorded disallowance during configuration phase, and not
> > override simply because it is for the first queue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mesut Ali Ergin <mesut.a.ergin@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
> > index 0e6ffa0..f30cab4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h
> > @@ -212,6 +212,10 @@
> > i40e_rx_vec_dev_conf_condition_check_default(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >  	if (rxmode->offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND)
> >  		return -1;
> >
> > +	/* Should not override if vector was already disallowed */
> 
> It is possible a device be reconfigured between dev_stop/dev_start, vector
> mode may fit for the new configure, so the old rx_vec_allowd should be
> ignored,
> 

i40e_dev_configure would reset rx_vec_allowed already. Am I missing 
another reconfiguration path?

Mesut

> Regards
> Qi
> 
> > +	if (!ad->rx_vec_allowed)
> > +	return -1;
> > +
> >  	/**
> >  	 * Vector mode is allowed only when number of Rx queue
> >  	 * descriptor is power of 2.
> > --
> > 2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-23 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-16  4:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/i40e: improve rte_flow offload with MARK + RSS Mesut Ali Ergin
2019-05-16  4:28 ` Mesut Ali Ergin
2019-05-16  4:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] net/i40e: add support for MARK + RSS action in rte_flow Mesut Ali Ergin
2019-05-16  4:28   ` Mesut Ali Ergin
2019-05-22 12:30   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-05-16  4:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/i40e: add runtime option to disable vector rx Mesut Ali Ergin
2019-05-16  4:28   ` Mesut Ali Ergin
2019-05-16  8:17   ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-16  8:17     ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-16 21:26     ` Ergin, Mesut A
2019-05-20  8:29   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-20 17:53     ` Ergin, Mesut A
2019-05-20 23:11       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-21 16:33         ` Ergin, Mesut A
2019-05-21 17:20           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-21 20:55             ` Ergin, Mesut A
2019-05-22 11:01               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-22 14:05                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-22 14:32                   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-05-23 13:10                     ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-05-23 17:54                 ` Ergin, Mesut A
2019-05-16  4:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] net/i40e: fix inadvertent override of vector RX allowance Mesut Ali Ergin
2019-05-16  4:28   ` Mesut Ali Ergin
2019-05-16  8:17   ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-16  8:17     ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-16 20:57     ` Ergin, Mesut A
2019-05-22 12:42   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-05-23 18:25     ` Ergin, Mesut A [this message]
2019-05-24  2:39       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-05-24 18:08         ` Ergin, Mesut A
2019-05-25 11:29           ` Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3615B82CA151CF42A86EDDD9846A8B38C7A8C3E5@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=mesut.a.ergin@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).