From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (xvm-189-124.dc0.ghst.net [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED39A0A00; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 20:34:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038A2140CA9; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 20:34:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oi1-f181.google.com (mail-oi1-f181.google.com [209.85.167.181]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7438140C9E for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 20:34:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oi1-f181.google.com with SMTP id w124so19704043oia.6 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 11:34:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pensando.io; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZO7tsgL7IsCO65Tkj5k3Iz9CWv1UIaCUzwfTqWcqz2k=; b=xOO6W6dW57DqOXXAWk8zx2VyEDLYK7dlcoTf24Jl1XR2BABuiOw2X+YNUBagy7YbIN 8p//8u52yAkIoq82jUagOyRc+q1Wa9ORxFcNm6Ci3UEnMFOgzq2fU55W7r7U97R3Z+GX M7lvNifWfkFBmb9fvxSIpLvn3Wm23/Q4YMsQL7PVexyb9TUxJA1wOBJHbV2WR+oUHBkG n36wPkVBpixZBLNTzImKuUKJNT/CJEXEkkdn9wVRmXEpT4fxkxc/cThlyQl0RxrHC9c/ VgJE4AioLy64k+rYoMaiA2XJcVny5y2+DdSP3CyRVWrF9OvqOWAqTfiKcMdtr4T2caGT OhXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZO7tsgL7IsCO65Tkj5k3Iz9CWv1UIaCUzwfTqWcqz2k=; b=R6NP47QOZZtkIW8v28t6koTDdCBKI3K+ySlZpHBUN9a6AEgJafkH6VeevzA2perVaC M7a/+LxJiZsxko8CTxQxf8J0WYsOZEMwpdBwYKoNBrvNvrtJP09PMb3ILEaoFGf5LWl7 CSOH6RixfUQpaYeo6D5+hHBzPiP0B9lEUyu3R7bY6/BBHWqNQvp/X8JKIGMdj6TCdwUD Psp1qXEpARjKR6Hszs5B3YdJMAlcpzV9dTke2BiSMCfS6+aWQvgKum5ZLbKkLbpuoDOA +30SYUfVvE+qviR0UXTsTJPo9OkK/+N3p8vjdQO0lPysJHRwzJt2cJ4SyaHoqp66nynf aTQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5318ktTRK/CMAuc++sJLOk6q6V+MkkZ+SS6qodu14aODfAkkXJjy 62P/HAXc+2RdxCpUsl1zSe/tSla0yjmdwA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjdVKAg76yVjDlFeADrsxUL2Q8BSb815E0eKoWzzns9FSWO6WiSEinRMeEeXw4b21rqXQmDQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fb43:: with SMTP id iq3mr10109599pjb.175.1609355380847; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 11:09:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1700:6b0:fde0:585c:f001:972e:4d67? ([2600:1700:6b0:fde0:585c:f001:972e:4d67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k3sm23258278pgm.94.2020.12.30.11.09.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Dec 2020 11:09:40 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) From: Andrew Boyer In-Reply-To: <1608724059-8562-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:09:37 -0500 Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com, Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, Phil.Yang@arm.com, vcchunga@amazon.com, Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com, jerinjacobk@gmail.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <36181A92-BE14-4E30-8F26-915AA109BB2F@pensando.io> References: <1605874101-30893-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> <1608724059-8562-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> To: =?utf-8?Q?Juraj_Linke=C5=A1?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 00/12] Arm build options rework X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > On Dec 23, 2020, at 6:47 AM, Juraj Linke=C5=A1 = wrote: >=20 > The current way of specifying Arm configuration options is = insufficient > since we can't identify the SoC we're building for from the MIDR > information. For example, we can't distinguish between N1SDP, = Graviton2 > or Ampere Altra. >=20 > Add a way to specify the cpu count and numa node count for cross = builds > and aarch64 -> aarch64 (SoC) builds. >=20 Hello Juraj, This is great, you have solved a problem for me before I even knew there = was one. (We have two SoCs with the same id and pn, but different core = counts etc.) Can anyone fill me in on how and when this patchset is going to be = taken? Will it go to dpdk-next-net, or to some other branch? Thank you, Andrew