From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449821B3C6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  2 Apr 2018 22:10:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CF020C68;
 Mon,  2 Apr 2018 16:10:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Apr 2018 16:10:33 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=ay9r4kfxhmi7q+21ry/lOHT7E5
 TTrB12IBM6Ynz5qNw=; b=hdgCMS9sKV1zbsfbZzatCLcq8wg7j3H8ADN/DUtg93
 dEZzucKh0zQDamw8yyQ9NSD7+bt17EdhwWkCXHoV0c1T92fu5vMioGd5MW3UV9Oh
 ntww9uCq2qBlgcaW73AybKZgkeeIWCEjSU22/0xX15CoGhoBV+QF0+wbIvO3INES
 0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ay9r4k
 fxhmi7q+21ry/lOHT7E5TTrB12IBM6Ynz5qNw=; b=JDiSsLvZJhz5d0I6fyvS0D
 VPY0VTgPMcSUhrU5gxzfsz3a4uq5MfCXzqyNCdm2zsoE0HJhvs5qvuRtudE1oI9p
 56+xv9cOJmXBnVutB/ywD1ppf3BFAAa7CGPUtURxAOL1DziPURwkI1ypX+jt9kS1
 40VGEsccmXH7YNcEUSHxvVjaEyX27c7xoK3NAMP/0jXlKFypY4XFH9ZnEGNXJKDl
 JaHkJF8X7//pKYizyOlnFLpZiPfs0JZKE0fXWeZWJEkGp1BPWN8JfOL96xw9+Uwq
 rQ7f6dkcc8xSJ5LhwuvUi0MjM7ZJwNWppNJg8sDFaaW3eXNSdB09FUK8up0Ee2PA
 ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:OY7CWqPEcAX5zoUu8BQrcviSyuSCS0_qC_UyDe1FnIwVq31l5nKsTQ>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9CBE2E444F;
 Mon,  2 Apr 2018 16:10:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Patil, Harish" <Harish.Patil@cavium.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>, "Jacob,
 Jerin" <Jerin.JacobKollanukkaran@cavium.com>, "Thotton,
 Shijith" <Shijith.Thotton@cavium.com>, "Shukla,
 Santosh" <Santosh.Shukla@cavium.com>,
 Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>,
 John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>, Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
 Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
 Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
 Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
 Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
 Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>,
 Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
 Tomasz Duszynski <tdu@semihalf.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@arm.com>,
 Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>,
 Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
 Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>, "Mody,
 Rasesh" <Rasesh.Mody@cavium.com>,
 Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
 Shrikrishna Khare <skhare@vmware.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
 Allain Legacy <allain.legacy@windriver.com>,
 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>,
 Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 22:10:14 +0200
Message-ID: <3635124.eX5m4pFW80@xps>
In-Reply-To: <D6E7B50D.1BC853%Harish.Patil@cavium.com>
References: <2759953.P7QpFFSjiU@xps> <D6E7B50D.1BC853%Harish.Patil@cavium.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Survey for final decision about per-port offload API
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 20:10:34 -0000

02/04/2018 19:39, Patil, Harish:
> >It was also proposed to relax the API and allow "forgetting" port
> >offloads in queue offloads:
> >	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-March/092978.html
> >
> >It would mean the offloads applied to a queue result of OR operation:
> >	rte_eth_conf.[rt]xmode.offloads | rte_eth_[rt]xconf.offloads
> >
> >1/ Do you agree with above API change?
>=20
> Yes. But pls confirm that this would still work properly if RX supports
> port-only based offloads and doesn=E2=80=99t support queue based offloads=
 at all,
> as advertised in dev_infos_get().
>=20
> dev_info->rx_queue_offload_capa =3D 0 and
> dev_info->rx_offload_capa =3D (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM | ...);

Yes, of course, no queue offload at all is possible.