DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
	Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Add 'try' semantics for RD and WR locking
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 03:39:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3706402.B1puXbZNJX@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1542130061-3702-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>

13/11/2018 18:27, Konstantin Ananyev:
> This series targets 19.02 release
> 
> Introduce rte_rwlock_read_trylock() and rte_rwlock_write_trylock()
> and new UT test-case for it.
> 
> Konstantin Ananyev (2):
>   rwlock: introduce 'try' semantics for RD and WR locking
>   test: add new test-cases for rwlock autotest

Any comment?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-19  2:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-13 17:27 Konstantin Ananyev
2018-11-13 17:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] rwlock: introduce " Konstantin Ananyev
2018-12-19  6:37   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-12-19  8:30     ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-19 10:28     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-12-19 10:56       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-12-19 11:00         ` Bruce Richardson
2018-12-19 12:41           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-12-19 15:11     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-12-19 16:27       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-11-13 17:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test: add new test-cases for rwlock autotest Konstantin Ananyev
2018-12-19  8:28   ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-19  2:39 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-12-19 18:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Add 'try' semantics for RD and WR locking Konstantin Ananyev
2018-12-19 19:53   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-12-19 18:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] rwlock: introduce " Konstantin Ananyev
2018-12-19 18:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test: add new test-cases for rwlock autotest Konstantin Ananyev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3706402.B1puXbZNJX@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).