DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>, Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11 LTS
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:49:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3748687.9eGIfCGZ7i@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171009014420.GG1545@yliu-home>

09/10/2017 03:44, Yuanhan Liu:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 07:12:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 06/10/2017 18:25, Luca Boccassi:
> > > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 16:05 +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > At the recent DPDK 2017 Userspace in Dublin it was agreed that we
> > > > should have a DPDK 17.11 LTS with 2 year support that would run in
> > > > parallel with the DPDK 16.11 LTS.
> > > > 
> > > > However, if order for this to happen the community will have to
> > > > provide a maintainer, either for 17.11 LTS or for 16.11 LTS (to allow
> > > > Yuanhan to move from 16.11 LTS maintenance to 17.11 LTS maintenance).
> > > > 
> > > > Ideally this person should come from one of the OSVs. Either way if
> > > > we don't get a volunteer we won't have a 17.11 LTS.
> > > > 
> > > > Volunteers please step forward.
> > > > 
> > > > John
> > > 
> > > Hello John,
> > > 
> > > I was just about to write you :-)
> > > 
> > > I am available to volunteer. I've just got permission from AT&T
> > > management to dedicate some working hours every week to the project
> > > (this is the reason why I didn't say anything on the spot - I needed to
> > > ask first due to the time requirements).
> > > 
> > > I am fine with either 16.11 or 17.11, whichever Yuanhan prefers.
> > > 
> > > Thanks!
> > 
> > Thanks a lot Luca, and welcome :)
> 
> +1 :)
> 
> > You will have to send me a public SSH key.
> 
> And we may should have a short chat, about the scripts I used for managing
> the stable/LTS releases.
> 
> > Yuanhan, how do you prefer to split the workload?
> 
> I'd prefer 17.11.
> 
> Thanks.

You mean that you are interested in managing 17.11 LTS yourself?
So Luca would become the new maintainer of 16.11 LTS?

Handshake?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-09  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-06 16:05 Mcnamara, John
2017-10-06 16:25 ` Luca Boccassi
2017-10-06 17:12   ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-09  1:44     ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-10-09  7:49       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-10-09  8:01         ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-10-09  9:43           ` Luca Boccassi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3748687.9eGIfCGZ7i@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).