From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03D742F61; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 23:55:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603DC40693; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 23:55:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B0B40041 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 23:55:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB4F5C01CE; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:55:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:55:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1690494924; x=1690581324; bh=xwkgcXNREHGSqso1I5P/2aIXLUt5xiozu9r IDMyVqwc=; b=Ygzkn66T0FOM3i8sMv/18UYUQJgyJNL4LlK3Bk1yBB4qlynRZax DfY2uPZRPyDZ11qH3f8uQUwm1fZfLGYKRVKb5n5fd8XeiC01ZGioESfrNOwuqv3V VcQ5kGttKq1CP8u36KHMQeBwlU9mDC6GLXGN5oTcy1xws1sn0+jS5le417hiTcWt SeMPNJtufE7wi5I6gr4LU9QyWk7YdSqap7OJ03bvjOcaApgSMVwAepMvl1qwbq7v kbWTjnSBTEpJM+dtkhQkCr5yb0c02UpWCF5Uyuj9TLysq8UQvazXsOe3FvhRZQRf rc2fvQnb/FDyItoqjXcpJ8s2TRTXZDlKd1w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1690494924; x=1690581324; bh=xwkgcXNREHGSqso1I5P/2aIXLUt5xiozu9r IDMyVqwc=; b=Pa48Z5Cwn4MwjCcoooIF43P7zoshB77A6hJ/nqW0dVZKxCLT+rE 31j2w2+89WMXgLotYtf7KRcHdTX8TcnnnpMaHKZOB2v75ve9bTV/pRStDU0BSVP1 e2Wk6I4+j81OKcz4Qc0GLni4PcFc2qFYtdR/Sd6n/a/zdBUIYsc0+yGAal96mxy6 NZ7cvn7A+fvEjHLg0LRFwaQaNnVOByPjSih6ZS8vY7rw0QzklXRAM2XNJMWm98Qm N2qz6LQKU5ewAziUTf/6EYlGWiT7IqVnur33ZVzFB4Z7pXD43hDGxr1pLTLc0lO6 qXS88f3EwN8iqJ2lhso8YI6aQNR2MSWQHmQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrieehgddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdfhveevhfduffekhffgfefhffevjeegvefhgeefjedugfduffeu jeekgeefhedvnecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghdpsggvhhgrvhhiohhurhdrrg hpphenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeht hhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:55:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Varghese, Vipin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc/dmadevs: add note clarifying naming of idxd devices Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 23:55:22 +0200 Message-ID: <3749929.kQq0lBPeGt@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20230725161629.307093-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org > > > Since the test-dma-perf application identifies devices by name, > > > include in the idxd driver documentation a note on device naming when > > vfio-pci. > > > See also discussion in bugzilla[1]. > > > > > > [1] https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1268 Bugzilla ID: 1268 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson > > > --- > > Note, although I reference bugzilla here, I don't consider this a bugfix, so I've > > not included a fixes tag and official bugzilla id etc. It's instead a note clarifying > > the expected behaviour. > > App/dma-perf got integrated into DPDK via `https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20230629131455.52732-1-cheng1.jiang@intel.com/`. The expectation is that, it is tried and tested for hardware dma, sw skeleton dma and cpu memcpy. > Happy to acknowledge the change as it helps the DPDK community. > > Acked-by: Vipin Varghese Replaced PCI id with PCI address, and applied, thanks.