DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
To: "Gaëtan Rivet" <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
Cc: Xueming Li <xuemingl@mellanox.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add config option to enable asserts
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:50:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <376B54EA-858D-4C22-8834-0F2708743336@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170823140946.GZ8124@bidouze.vm.6wind.com>


> On Aug 23, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Gaëtan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:00:08PM +0800, Xueming Li wrote:
>> Currently, enabling assertion have to set CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL to
>> RTE_LOG_DEBUG. CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL is the default log level of control
>> path, RTE_LOG_DP_LEVEL is the log level of data path. It's a little bit
>> hard to understand literally that assertion is decided by control path
>> LOG_LEVEL, especially assertion used on data path.
>> 
>> On the other hand, DPDK need an assertion enabling switch w/o impacting
>> log output level, assuming "--log-level" not specified.
>> 
>> Assertion is an important API to balance DPDK high performance and
>> robustness. To promote assertion usage, it's valuable to unhide
>> assertion out of COFNIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL.
>> 
>> In one word, log is log, assertion is assertion, debug is hot pot :)
>> 
>> Rationale of this patch is to introduce an independant switch of
>> assertion.
>> 
>> BTW, CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL is merely a default value of runtime global
>> log level, not sure the value to keep it in compile time configuration.
>> 
> 
> I agree.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Xueming Li <xuemingl@mellanox.com>
>> ---
>> config/common_base                        | 1 +
>> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_debug.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/config/common_base b/config/common_base
>> index 5e97a08b6..ce14b1cac 100644
>> --- a/config/common_base
>> +++ b/config/common_base
>> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ CONFIG_RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES=8
>> CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEMSEG=256
>> CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEMZONE=2560
>> CONFIG_RTE_MAX_TAILQ=32
>> +CONFIG_RTE_ASSERTION=n
> 
> I'm not sure about the name, but I'm not maintainer.
> I'd suggest something like RTE_ASSERT_ENABLE.

I believe the define should be readable and state what it does, so I would suggest we use RTE_ASSERT_ENABLE or RTE_ENABLE_ASSERT the last one is more readable from you point of view.

> 
>> CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL=RTE_LOG_INFO
>> CONFIG_RTE_LOG_DP_LEVEL=RTE_LOG_INFO
>> CONFIG_RTE_LOG_HISTORY=256
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_debug.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_debug.h
>> index cab6fb4c9..d1104c240 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_debug.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_debug.h
>> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ void rte_dump_registers(void);
>> #define rte_panic(...) rte_panic_(__func__, __VA_ARGS__, "dummy")
>> #define rte_panic_(func, format, ...) __rte_panic(func, format "%.0s", __VA_ARGS__)
>> 
>> -#if RTE_LOG_LEVEL >= RTE_LOG_DEBUG
>> +#ifdef RTE_ASSERTION
>> #define RTE_ASSERT(exp)	RTE_VERIFY(exp)
>> #else
>> #define RTE_ASSERT(exp) do {} while (0)
>> -- 
>> 2.13.3
>> 
> 
> Regardless of which name is used:
> 
> Acked-by: Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
> 
> -- 
> Gaëtan Rivet
> 6WIND

Regards,
Keith


  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-23 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23 14:00 Xueming Li
2017-08-23 14:09 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-08-23 14:50   ` Wiles, Keith [this message]
2017-08-24  8:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Xueming Li
2017-08-24  8:23 ` Xueming Li
2017-10-09 21:01   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=376B54EA-858D-4C22-8834-0F2708743336@intel.com \
    --to=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
    --cc=xuemingl@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).