From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA83FA0353; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 18:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407372BF1; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 18:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6085C2B87 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 18:09:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A015C0121; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:09:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 12:09:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= U5szA9QYZdbvMrSPNHVYIOZ0jCO8uOVNdlpeQe2SlL4=; b=MhLrVucv9yR+sdk0 f6cMd+PkME0bnupsLd8Hkfdhbx7D85H8wmhSzITTVwCKU/VcufeVDApSCVvDuXs3 uaQsY0WccNA5kOhFlovP+h7VUFL+jBduiw0KbcmeCIHDeNRtA3ZpF2Fojzx/Oot7 Gl7gAHPUmXjWVWCysmudkVjiEWjoKvx/xxk+Km8FeBJGbNLUAIIZVy63FxBtED6J a8D8evUqGV87mHkZjTd6jLnGokpZsnKTwyfrToBjoM10t+iSi8s1y0DL01CA6WAy 7bV7TL+oBJTfz3jpLgfCEa9oaQs4xdz97GJP12BTn1r0i+nWjYEfLYyV3Fr08AsV XHkOwQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=U5szA9QYZdbvMrSPNHVYIOZ0jCO8uOVNdlpeQe2Sl L4=; b=c5kjjZwCREccmTxvGbrgNUJft2Oo3eRb845OOJVLU09IDdXT3FlSVpUdW xKnfsCR0Oq5APphMmo6QVbN1dbqa4uQ084PGKisjXqBFNjlzWGWqfjDZ1WkNOrW9 RKdi5ZSUuNBFgglv+nk4lV097o+RmatHfnvm+8fpLSonpOdV1MIoAozHlPYZD38u WIbELEkXJAWAxqVNSwFI/Wdv40Kdm2ImtB5aVHDVDos4dv2m7LOjYHTdLHtM1HUv qHWd9sWhdpx2XPQuxAnGCAelJrwO2Byne9Iz25ynVX84fGqrfTbFZcEGNPfSoB+p r0z6f4pU91IeUlyWnR4nwF5AuHT1Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrkedtgddutddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdekteeviefhgeeftdefjeeukeekkeeuvefgjeeuvdeivddvveeu gfetvedtfeevnecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrd dvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhf rhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8EC8D3280068; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:09:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Trahe, Fiona" , David Marchand , "Kusztal, ArkadiuszX" , Anoob Joseph , Akhil Goyal Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "shallyv@marvell.com" , "Doherty, Declan" , "Zhang, Roy Fan" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 18:09:40 +0200 Message-ID: <3785663.8APzvf4N2U@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20200729144651.17524-1-arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] doc: announce removal of crypto list end enumerators X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 31/07/2020 11:38, Akhil Goyal: > Hi David, >=20 > > Hi David, > >=20 > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:47 PM Arek Kusztal > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Enumerators RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_LIST_END, > > RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_LIST_END, > > > > RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_LIST_END will be removed to prevent some problems > > > > that may arise when adding new algorithms. > > > > > > How does it cohabitate with Ferruh notice? > > > Is it a complement? or redundant? > > > > > > > > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst?i= d=3D58245da070289f4b248f15 > > > > > Thanks for drawing attention to this. > > It's complementary as far as I can see. > > Ferruh's doesn't list all enums - but doesn=E2=80=99t appear to cover t= hese crypto ones. >=20 > I feel we can have this deprecation notice as well for crypto specific en= ums. > Though I don=E2=80=99t want to push it if somebody has objections on this. > I am OK if Ferruh's notice looks enough to cover crypto enums as well. >=20 > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal > If no objections, Thomas or you can pick this directly on master. I think Ferruh notice would be enough, except it focus on "MAX" values, not including the similar ones with "END" in their names. Anyway, too much notices don't hurt. Applied