From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xnhp0320@icloud.com>
Received: from nk11p03mm-asmtp002.mac.com (nk11p03mm-asmtp002.mac.com
 [17.158.232.237]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C828D255
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  3 Aug 2015 11:12:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.31.134]
 (250.229.126.124.broad.bjtelecom.net [124.126.229.250])
 by nk11p03mm-asmtp002.mac.com
 (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.35.0 64bit (built Mar 31 2015))
 with ESMTPSA id <0NSI003031K39G50@nk11p03mm-asmtp002.mac.com> for
 dev@dpdk.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:12:10 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure
 engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151,1.0.33,0.0.0000
 definitions=2015-08-03_01:2015-08-01,2015-08-02,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0
 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412110000 definitions=main-1508030152
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: HePeng <xnhp0320@icloud.com>
In-reply-to: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC0909D1A660@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:12:01 +0800
Message-id: <379327D6-D2AB-467E-9F95-88F449B7EF4E@icloud.com>
References: <1438392394-19653-1-git-send-email-xnhp0320@icloud.com>
 <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC0909D1A508@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <179B898C-F03A-4250-8857-236CFC5274BA@icloud.com>
 <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC0909D1A59D@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <470BDF91-6FAE-4605-885E-78F02F0F0FBF@icloud.com>
 <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC0909D1A630@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <9375FD93-28D0-47AD-9CBB-CD099E3CD488@icloud.com>
 <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC0909D1A660@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] [new]ixgbe:set txep.mbuf to NULL when
 calling ixgbe_tx_free_bufs
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:12:11 -0000

 Hi, wenzhuo,
	Have to check that because I really had the panic when compile =
my code with dpdk 2.0.0.=20

	Also I checked the code in the dpdk git repo. It does not check =
the reference count, it just only calculate=20
the begin positions of mbufs that really needs to be recycled.=20
	my code is retrieved from git://dpdk.org/dpdk =
<git://dpdk.org/dpdk>.=20

	Thanks for reviewing.

> =D4=DA 2015=C4=EA8=D4=C23=C8=D5=A3=AC=CF=C2=CE=E74:42=A3=ACLu, Wenzhuo =
<wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> =D0=B4=B5=C0=A3=BA
>=20
> Hi  Peng,
> There=A1=AFre 2 versions of ixgbe_tx_queue_release_mbufs. One in =
ixgbe_rxtx.c, the other is in ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c.
> What you shown is the one in ixgbe_rxtx.c. You can find the one in =
ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c already has the sanity check for reference count.
> Thanks.