From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3810FA0561; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:42:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55231D44E; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:42:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0C11C2C0 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:42:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BBC363; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:42:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:42:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= spnrl5NtF0TM/7Q1EZojiQnMu09AJk2c+DgEonwCZ4s=; b=x9IPRzGflVBEpyqS Pdc1eSJsluciam/cViDkAl6iaUh8EAxJgNlGhvolbMJ1K8h/B7BJP3mkAQOVEpEr ZMjYHXi+LLjhCU1xModMPkmNShueotOS/rLcvuMyx7T1NzfsxqxaSc6pP1+qQYGL CAnRbBNcHdPBqZoQxTPK6Bx0gpIgM3kEK4vwTjsdSaGjX2W3xuufZplmoCk4WuxQ AS0W4FHRI5iAMcQYSFGMaslJ38Ayr7+dSEfZ101GKzJBilCkNcRvCqQanGbpCfna UC/vnQKjDq7JmCs4OgfTHYp/j9lzjchij8pYRK8QPHHltz8OazV3sIeQRbbwisgN EytNlw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=spnrl5NtF0TM/7Q1EZojiQnMu09AJk2c+DgEonwCZ 4s=; b=Wy8nxeREmhQBRbx1qOCJWBAbKOBossjvRYkSQGgQ5a2Z6e0tIu3biiTFp pm35SFZNHfMTLYsziP7zi1V6x7B1fek4Acs3Y93r6K/H4fCiWk0qOV7ofCgoE6D8 TJa2JA1U3THl+5iXZkczRXyNB1f7rF53JKPBrOTC7Kr2aL7sN+HsXgetE0tZUbiM TMkfWrxTFE1ljkM+Dkwr2fxj1uxe97X3+ckJjuOsu3QFNAIj+ymEFu/kXAuWJ2BU 6D7rKqfXOO+LzCylGOncikoThdEpu7BPv5nD75KljZlIwGw9dNySJqKKFRn8oxZN n26ZWekCgoomABRD/hIDge964a9nA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrgeefgdduuddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuff homhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrg hssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1C7203280060; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:42:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Wang, Haiyue" Cc: Neil Horman , David Marchand , dev , "Burakov, Anatoly" , Vamsi Attunuru , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Alex Williamson Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:42:32 +0200 Message-ID: <3886348.YqazSvReao@thomas> In-Reply-To: <47965937c20e43bebd7458951699a597@intel.com> References: <20200305043311.17065-1-vattunuru@marvell.com> <3674958.iIHpSLecBQ@thomas> <47965937c20e43bebd7458951699a597@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] support for VFIO-PCI VF token interface X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 20/04/2020 19:37, Wang, Haiyue: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 20/04/2020 19:02, Wang, Haiyue: > > > From: David Marchand > > > > I had a look at the CI, I can see we are still missing bits to handle > > > > the ABI failure on rte_vfio_setup_device. > > > > > > Yes, not handle it now. > > > > > > If 'rte_vfio_setup_device' can be internal, not official DPDK API, then __rte_internal > > > is the best way to handle ABI issue. > > > > Please could you help finishing integration of __rte_internal? > > I thought it should be Neil ? "Yes, I'll get back to this today" ;-) > http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CAJFAV8ydLkV0afEHqbh6KeA3Box0Yxb3N0MNGtMD4S9bmSgT0A@mail.gmail.com/ It did not happen after several months. If you want to unblock your patches, I think it is safer to finish yourself.