* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask
@ 2018-12-11 17:25 Didier Pallard
2018-12-11 22:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-13 9:47 ` [dpdk-dev] " Zhang, Qi Z
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Didier Pallard @ 2018-12-11 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: stable
This reverts
commit 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask")
Contrary to what is said in above patch commit log,
I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK is the mask of Tx offload bits that are part
of PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK but not included in I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK.
Above patch erroneously includes all PKT_RX_OFFLOAD_ bits in the
I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK, this is not what is expected.
Restore the initial xor that gives the expected result.
Fixes: 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>
---
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
index e1152ff0ea58..ab74a488f88b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST)
#define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK \
- ~(PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK & I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
+ (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
static inline void
i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci(struct rte_mbuf *mb, volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp)
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask
2018-12-11 17:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask Didier Pallard
@ 2018-12-11 22:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-12 3:03 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-12-12 6:17 ` Ye Xiaolong
2018-12-13 9:47 ` [dpdk-dev] " Zhang, Qi Z
1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2018-12-11 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Didier Pallard, dev; +Cc: stable, Xiaolong Ye, Qi Zhang, Beilei Xing
On 12/11/2018 5:25 PM, Didier Pallard wrote:
> This reverts
> commit 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask")
>
> Contrary to what is said in above patch commit log,
> I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK is the mask of Tx offload bits that are part
> of PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK but not included in I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK.
> Above patch erroneously includes all PKT_RX_OFFLOAD_ bits in the
> I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK, this is not what is expected.
Argh, yes it does set Rx offload bits, +1 to revert.
cc'ed author and maintainers of the PMD.
> Restore the initial xor that gives the expected result.
>
> Fixes: 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> index e1152ff0ea58..ab74a488f88b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
> I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST)
>
> #define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK \
> - ~(PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK & I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
> + (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
>
> static inline void
> i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci(struct rte_mbuf *mb, volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask
2018-12-11 22:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
@ 2018-12-12 3:03 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-12-12 6:17 ` Ye Xiaolong
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Qi Z @ 2018-12-12 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yigit, Ferruh, Didier Pallard, dev; +Cc: stable, Ye, Xiaolong, Xing, Beilei
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 6:01 AM
> To: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Ye, Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported
> mask
>
> On 12/11/2018 5:25 PM, Didier Pallard wrote:
> > This reverts
> > commit 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask")
> >
> > Contrary to what is said in above patch commit log,
> > I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK is the mask of Tx offload bits that are
> > part of PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK but not included in I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK.
> > Above patch erroneously includes all PKT_RX_OFFLOAD_ bits in the
> > I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK, this is not what is expected.
>
> Argh, yes it does set Rx offload bits, +1 to revert.
> cc'ed author and maintainers of the PMD.
I think this revert make sense to me, I didn't notice Tx offload and Rx offload shared the same 64 bits previously
>
> > Restore the initial xor that gives the expected result.
> >
> > Fixes: 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index e1152ff0ea58..ab74a488f88b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
> > I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST)
> >
> > #define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK \
> > - ~(PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK & I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
> > + (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
> >
> > static inline void
> > i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci(struct rte_mbuf *mb, volatile union i40e_rx_desc
> > *rxdp)
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask
2018-12-11 22:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-12 3:03 ` Zhang, Qi Z
@ 2018-12-12 6:17 ` Ye Xiaolong
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ye Xiaolong @ 2018-12-12 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Didier Pallard, Ferruh Yigit; +Cc: dev, stable, Qi Zhang, Beilei Xing
On 12/11, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>On 12/11/2018 5:25 PM, Didier Pallard wrote:
>> This reverts
>> commit 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask")
>>
>> Contrary to what is said in above patch commit log,
>> I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK is the mask of Tx offload bits that are part
>> of PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK but not included in I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK.
>> Above patch erroneously includes all PKT_RX_OFFLOAD_ bits in the
>> I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK, this is not what is expected.
>
>Argh, yes it does set Rx offload bits, +1 to revert.
>cc'ed author and maintainers of the PMD.
>
Thanks for catching it and sorry for my unthoughtful patch.
Thanks,
Xiaolong
>> Restore the initial xor that gives the expected result.
>>
>> Fixes: 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>> Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
>> index e1152ff0ea58..ab74a488f88b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
>> I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST)
>>
>> #define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK \
>> - ~(PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK & I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
>> + (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
>>
>> static inline void
>> i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci(struct rte_mbuf *mb, volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp)
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask
2018-12-11 17:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask Didier Pallard
2018-12-11 22:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
@ 2018-12-13 9:47 ` Zhang, Qi Z
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Qi Z @ 2018-12-13 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Didier Pallard, dev; +Cc: stable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Didier Pallard
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 1:25 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask
>
> This reverts
> commit 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask")
>
> Contrary to what is said in above patch commit log,
> I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK is the mask of Tx offload bits that are part of
> PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK but not included in I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK.
> Above patch erroneously includes all PKT_RX_OFFLOAD_ bits in the
> I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK, this is not what is expected.
> Restore the initial xor that gives the expected result.
>
> Fixes: 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>
Acked-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel
Thanks
Qi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-13 9:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-12-11 17:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask Didier Pallard
2018-12-11 22:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-12 3:03 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-12-12 6:17 ` Ye Xiaolong
2018-12-13 9:47 ` [dpdk-dev] " Zhang, Qi Z
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).