From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F771B2D9; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 19:19:48 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Dec 2017 10:19:47 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,437,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="15593193" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2017 10:19:46 -0800 Received: from sivswdev01.ir.intel.com (sivswdev01.ir.intel.com [10.237.217.45]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id vBLIJjTF012358; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:19:45 GMT Received: from sivswdev01.ir.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sivswdev01.ir.intel.com with ESMTP id vBLIJjFT032754; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:19:45 GMT Received: (from aburakov@localhost) by sivswdev01.ir.intel.com with LOCAL id vBLIJjZf032750; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:19:45 GMT From: Anatoly Burakov To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy , stable@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:19:44 +0000 Message-Id: <38c97df0b43676153ddf13923d676b98937c2f68.1513866482.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.0.7 In-Reply-To: <5c1a7f3bfe6bbfc86f536541833de4ab1789a95c.1513866482.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> References: <5c1a7f3bfe6bbfc86f536541833de4ab1789a95c.1513866482.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <5c1a7f3bfe6bbfc86f536541833de4ab1789a95c.1513866482.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> References: <5c1a7f3bfe6bbfc86f536541833de4ab1789a95c.1513866482.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] test: fix wrong test in memzone autotest X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:19:49 -0000 When reserving memzones in autotest, it makes no sense to expect a failed memzone reserve when we specify both size flags - instead, we should expect a memzone reserved with one of the two sizes. Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov --- test/test/test_memzone.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/test/test_memzone.c b/test/test/test_memzone.c index 5c0567f..ecd9880 100644 --- a/test/test/test_memzone.c +++ b/test/test/test_memzone.c @@ -289,10 +289,19 @@ test_memzone_reserve_flags(void) if (hugepage_2MB_avail && hugepage_1GB_avail) { mz = rte_memzone_reserve("flag_zone_2M_HINT", size, SOCKET_ID_ANY, RTE_MEMZONE_2MB|RTE_MEMZONE_1GB); - if (mz != NULL) { + if (mz == NULL) { printf("BOTH SIZES SET\n"); return -1; } + if (mz->hugepage_sz != RTE_PGSIZE_1G && + mz->hugepage_sz != RTE_PGSIZE_2M) { + printf("Wrong size when both sizes set\n"); + return -1; + } + if (rte_memzone_free(mz)) { + printf("Fail memzone free\n"); + return -1; + } } } /* @@ -424,10 +433,19 @@ test_memzone_reserve_flags(void) mz = rte_memzone_reserve("flag_zone_16M_HINT", size, SOCKET_ID_ANY, RTE_MEMZONE_16MB|RTE_MEMZONE_16GB); - if (mz != NULL) { + if (mz == NULL) { printf("BOTH SIZES SET\n"); return -1; } + if (mz->hugepage_sz != RTE_PGSIZE_16G && + mz->hugepage_sz != RTE_PGSIZE_16M) { + printf("Wrong size when both sizes set\n"); + return -1; + } + if (rte_memzone_free(mz)) { + printf("Fail memzone free\n"); + return -1; + } } } return 0; -- 2.7.4