From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-qt0-f169.google.com (mail-qt0-f169.google.com
 [209.85.216.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284126A87
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 19:09:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-qt0-f169.google.com with SMTP id s49so60310005qta.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=nHkVprxSFlPQvwwVCmbHCCi9fKwjvaGNMy1PFBi9nHo=;
 b=1jl27O4IEflX3FQFwhp+PXyf32RzOXPSk3G/8avYYLihqOpDet/PHcakNP1vML1diq
 VYhBTvpXw2lQ0ObZXU+DKZA7WXyPXIljbC7iQOX2klHNe/bKzGv1jSQKz+tOeeXOs1kX
 6jxMesOArJ7TS+xwcbyFWrEH9lar54j3WtYgfP084OBlNB6YZVRLZ3A2baBNSLoGQteS
 0/ghAeTGyvIpL40LxD236u148aPzU4CQXOQdr1/yU5xPrkgW1vCqwMLKWTRzLjTUtQHr
 dcKg7hrjTBvks31DjNN93+hzobHp+jLMeOnH8N+z6UmXkaupRSW+qFa0SXC+fyInWSpB
 y71w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=nHkVprxSFlPQvwwVCmbHCCi9fKwjvaGNMy1PFBi9nHo=;
 b=WhGvO1YbBrwYCJ2p4EZWz6iKmKh3xFPpkOOHet0U9ve+nbvcQ/9UWpRyzKkt+i1pC0
 MKLAdeVT7Uh+siNe4DTtq1kQ2DKG9uuNZ5RXgCIvWMgWctQKGwMIB01PmE1gow7Y5exe
 Dl6o+vUWSTaZ1BCzqvO/kwQqUefbadwlG92O2TqW6Vnilm9hk7xlWHApKHIcuMuN/Xku
 msiw/+y0cgljUqqWmwm6wOun1sNsubtpSNqLIAV3mgHcBT4xn4YVKc0q6yJLm/vLLb6k
 d5CcVBq+HVAPoqZ3sw5P3o7Vv4dZSyOJZ0CqqwxyNHshE7rkvE5VS4Sy4ihzI6OSDSDa
 Xa0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkNXLuI/Vyq9mFzXLjqn1SPESQV5f01rrreQPgW7oMaqmjzxc/a5CUtJUwYVVOCTEPM
X-Received: by 10.195.3.4 with SMTP id bs4mr30851690wjd.193.1476119381111;
 Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v3sm7569984wjm.4.2016.10.10.10.09.39
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
Cc: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 19:09:39 +0200
Message-ID: <3926568.66BEXk8PUy@xps13>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F010ADCFC@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <57EB30E0.30106@intel.com> <2578548.bj2dOLfXoi@xps13>
 <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F010ADCFC@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel
	processors code names
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:09:44 -0000

2016-10-10 15:21, Pattan, Reshma:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > Why not recommend GCC 4.9 and keep the graceful degradation for older
> > versions, at least for one more year, even if it is not optimal for newer
> > architectures?
> 
> I am ok with the idea, so should I send latest patch by keeping the code in
> mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.toolchain-compat.mk untouched/intact?

Yes please.