From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CD8106A for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:43:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c78so1979022wme.1 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:43:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TaTWnZUMSYB7qyZpkV8/YhVtN92/atLyv2LUbeFPDD8=; b=xTvmEPa26fkLYdz2Pp5aYixC+VnqgdJ4AEA4c2WX3eUFYvicPnSxWWdbGZA7PB2B0L MaUw1hJch89qxpgesCTO5Wp0FH124SlYCYvqyjliUbbXWS2o4P85yvvKXd20oe5ErnrA BsVxRiwifTX7cOghrKUoZcPolGx01HvGRoPBVcdc7tK6UH5MR3PXNqMVdGTWkJnbWNQw 5WuhOA9EKHihl4fzv9aWZ9sAxjGRBBANpb5uHgFSyggXwKJ/HWpDsVq9LDjK+Z63Y2u5 769ssqAYmb8oI0ebqaqPdiKbXE0giLLqzm9kTWGRVh95R/sgY3q9I0339Fs9EzxqfyJy gxnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TaTWnZUMSYB7qyZpkV8/YhVtN92/atLyv2LUbeFPDD8=; b=m6cbv/ZHgDj0qEp15YhHPMbEDPuyDy7tUvw5bhXHDh8Qb0lEu9gu4br7lHupywh4zW k+tQEVvZr7dD0GoP4F0KlaT/Qcxohnre0JSnxYGwaDgjHt/Fj7UJSC4O3TibITYz3zrm wgKTQ9ul/STLfFy82BFo+wF7Ps5BsmAMGvidhJ20OqCsxApdck6woWXj+xC0rFYRt7c2 UnElSRDLboihLJquWxyVSHTI4PqToY5B6mAQunTsuUtNzuC6W90dS8B4U7nJlZvJBBxO OCJgFwMzPJntKmi2AiJqzxqua97/yohne/wTuGTX4Frj2+RyFotFgpVND4kJ967tkPHU LubQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rna1n8KiKwPpDu5aAYYq8t3YDO2+2mLBiwl0uuMrYPvxXM55/IDL5ASwIty4l6E1CAW X-Received: by 10.28.88.134 with SMTP id m128mr320329wmb.39.1476258181948; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r1sm10931185wjc.43.2016.10.12.00.43.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:43:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:43 +0200 From: Thomas Monjalon To: qin.chunhua@zte.com.cn Cc: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org Message-ID: <3947933.oyJplKdvEH@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Project Governance and Linux Foundation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:43:02 -0000 Hi, This is a really interesting use case. Questions below, 2016-10-12 13:44, qin.chunhua@zte.com.cn: > ZTE is supportive of improving the DPDK project governance including > moving the project to the Linux Foundation. > DPDK has been used in lots of ZTE's equipments and solutions such as > BBU,RNC,EPC,vEPC,vBRAS,vCPE,vRouter,vSwitch,and so on for many years. > We have also done some optimization in DPDK. You mean you made some optimizations to DPDK but keep them secret? > If the DPDK project governance moves to the Linux Foundation, > we think this will promote ZTE and other companies to contribute in DPDK. Why it would help you to contribute? Why not contribute today? The project is truly open, a lot of major companies are contributing, why not yours?