From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887825921
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  9 Dec 2015 21:06:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id v187so1691678wmv.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:06:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
 :content-type; bh=9hnvBm42F9z4l6tnuNJAMW2REMsX938TdE3aH04pXbg=;
 b=XImF7FR8s2G8WQtT48H3NbqSx9Dyym3WbQDAiSzpUnyxy9asoD18onkLGZ4MWJa6+a
 yb3Q3WXiM6aNaBI0uo2e+dG9Mt2QbxIAMnJZV9EiwBQ2FZpRuVTYkkD5XCORUovRtMao
 mqo/0KHSnyU2a4XPgTQlGNo95hsthvj/LBaRNGw542tP0onzWGohqFwExEp0y7HjgBVQ
 XO5dAXGMWyxUAS1bO7J1L2eJk32f7GfA2MBwkUiFxvObIlP2r5h2kDnE3XiKVw1O7JLN
 Yyp/wuSHVGvAZczMeOqu6dDz8ENFUFcLerkrcNKM7/qNg43WvTGb0sB9ZkcbtZs/P6wh
 UTvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=9hnvBm42F9z4l6tnuNJAMW2REMsX938TdE3aH04pXbg=;
 b=Ud9EoRC9TWVd2ASdUwJSPAZ//OKeOg/hjG04h43+eMCvCYvFcdx+fGKqFz/EscoI+9
 h15AkbuXEcRvv1ijriECgHiyLcnCPBgulpeAG3ztNM+j+PJ1mzxcpXmzi/9PjQ6waP3i
 VnHObpTN17Q7pPS/9eNWKK/FhMvZ4vRehixVLQsIj+HYzKbfHEtjh2EqKv6cWAh6k0AW
 jiTRKa5pb297pv5LhKmycsvd2yH8S4F9TlHWa3lhhFFB1ZBJs24akG7ilkxsFo01mm78
 qDk0OooFpVcgFbovlaegJcJWPU+jftO+rcjmgQ318e44MkUDfS0nP8Voeo4fFOt+XIio
 K7xQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn1UnAuJs07n4HncfURuXIibzSIW4ofYMQyRLl9hm3ntqfplDI6vlLYADRRJEntk+53/WfjGsPi6GIE/IUJXQEL2Fepmw==
X-Received: by 10.194.178.135 with SMTP id cy7mr8056916wjc.61.1449691597390;
 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:06:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u139sm27511705wmu.22.2015.12.09.12.06.36
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:06:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Martinx - =?utf-8?B?44K444Kn44O844Og44K6?= <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 21:05:21 +0100
Message-ID: <3960464.KpnL1qVCkN@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAJSM8J0ax6ZQRKWJr8vaFZGWnB_FvQLHm3YMCxKnGmpC=qeOtw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAATJJ0KMa=+KW3FoguNKBx8=ZfjiNYKbm0gPSTa0qW0vnJ79Fw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJSM8J3QgywrVNZ8avtwWGa_i_JAjViLksgE477=pGoaDhz2Qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJSM8J0ax6ZQRKWJr8vaFZGWnB_FvQLHm3YMCxKnGmpC=qeOtw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some
	errors
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 20:06:37 -0000

2015-12-09 15:54, Martinx - =E3=82=B8=E3=82=A7=E3=83=BC=E3=83=A0=E3=82=BA=
:
>  Sorry to insist on this subject but, the time for releasing DPDK 2.2=

> is near and DPDK build with Xen 32-bit is broken.
>=20
>  If DPDK doesn't fix this, there will be no way to enable XenVirt
> support for next Ubuntu LTS 16.04, which is a shame...
>=20
>  I'm planning to use DPDK on Xen domUs (PVM, HVM, XenServer and on
> Amazon EC2) powered exclusively by a supported version of Ubuntu but,=

> it is broken now...
>=20
>  So, please, can someone take a look into this?    :-P
>=20
>  Thanks in advance!

Sorry, this area has no maintainer:
=09http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/MAINTAINERS#n169

In such case, it may be logic to remove the dead code.
If someone wants to make it alive, he's welcome!