From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] testpmd: cleanup cleanly from signal
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 11:05:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39978e88-a231-9ef4-197e-ee1948d9c8ef@oktetlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221110165359.343010-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
On 11/10/22 19:53, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Do a clean shutdown of testpmd when a signal is received;
> instead of having testpmd kill itself.
> This fixes the problem where a signal could be received
> in the middle of a PMD and then the signal handler would call
> PMD's close routine leading to locking problems.
>
> An added benefit is it gets rid of some Windows specific code.
>
> Fixes: d9a191a00e81 ("app/testpmd: fix quitting in container")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
> v5 - drop unnecessary print in signal handler.
> don't cleanup twice
> don't print message when select() is interrupted.
>
> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> index cf5942d0c422..62d87f758ac8 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> +#include <sys/select.h>
> #endif
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> @@ -4224,13 +4225,6 @@ init_port(void)
> memset(txring_numa, NUMA_NO_CONFIG, RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS);
> }
>
> -static void
> -force_quit(void)
> -{
> - pmd_test_exit();
> - prompt_exit();
> -}
> -
> static void
> print_stats(void)
> {
> @@ -4249,28 +4243,9 @@ print_stats(void)
> }
>
> static void
> -signal_handler(int signum)
> +signal_handler(int signum __rte_unused)
> {
> - if (signum == SIGINT || signum == SIGTERM) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "\nSignal %d received, preparing to exit...\n",
> - signum);
> -#ifdef RTE_LIB_PDUMP
> - /* uninitialize packet capture framework */
> - rte_pdump_uninit();
> -#endif
> -#ifdef RTE_LIB_LATENCYSTATS
> - if (latencystats_enabled != 0)
> - rte_latencystats_uninit();
> -#endif
> - force_quit();
> - /* Set flag to indicate the force termination. */
> - f_quit = 1;
> - /* exit with the expected status */
> -#ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS
> - signal(signum, SIG_DFL);
> - kill(getpid(), signum);
> -#endif
> - }
> + f_quit = 1;
> }
>
> int
> @@ -4449,9 +4424,6 @@ main(int argc, char** argv)
> } else
> #endif
> {
> - char c;
> - int rc;
> -
> f_quit = 0;
>
> printf("No commandline core given, start packet forwarding\n");
> @@ -4476,15 +4448,41 @@ main(int argc, char** argv)
> prev_time = cur_time;
> rte_delay_us_sleep(US_PER_S);
> }
> - }
> + } else {
> + char c;
> + fd_set fds;
> + int rc;
>
> - printf("Press enter to exit\n");
> - rc = read(0, &c, 1);
> - pmd_test_exit();
> - if (rc < 0)
> - return 1;
> + printf("Press enter to exit\n");
> +
> + FD_ZERO(&fds);
> + FD_SET(0, &fds);
> +
> + rc = select(1, &fds, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> + if (rc < 0 && errno != EINTR) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "Select failed: %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + return 1;
> + }
> + if (rc > 0)
> + rc = read(0, &c, 1);
> +
> + pmd_test_exit();
It looks wrong to skip pmd_test_exit() in periodic stats
case (if body above). Earlier it happened in signal handler.
IMHO, pmd_test_exit() should be done just before pdump
uninit below (outside if/else bodies (and removed from
interactive == 1 branch above).
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return 1;
It took some time for me to understand what's happening here.
Finally I came to conclusion that it just preserve previous
behaviour to return with failure code immediately if read
fails. Except addition of pmd_test_exit() above.
I think it is a wrong behaviour to skip all cleanup which
is done below, but I agree that it is a separate issue to
fix.
> + prompt_exit();
prompt_exit() is registered as atexit() callback and if I'm not
mistakes will be called anyway.
> + }
> }
>
> +#ifdef RTE_LIB_PDUMP
> + /* uninitialize packet capture framework */
> + rte_pdump_uninit();
> +#endif
> +#ifdef RTE_LIB_LATENCYSTATS
> + if (latencystats_enabled != 0)
> + rte_latencystats_uninit();
> +#endif
> +
> ret = rte_eal_cleanup();
> if (ret != 0)
> rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-11 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-14 17:23 [RFC 1/2] testpmd: make f_quit flag volatile Stephen Hemminger
2022-10-14 17:23 ` [RFC 2/2] testpmd: cleanup cleanly from signal Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-06 10:50 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-11-08 18:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-08 20:24 ` [PATCH v3] " Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-09 4:10 ` [PATCH v4] " Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-09 21:46 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-11-09 22:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-10 7:50 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-11-10 16:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-10 22:06 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-11-09 17:29 ` [PATCH v5] " Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-10 7:14 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-11-10 16:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-10 16:53 ` [PATCH v6] " Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-11 8:05 ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2022-11-11 16:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-11 16:51 ` [PATCH v7] " Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-12 17:28 ` [PATCH v8] " Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-19 15:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-25 18:32 ` [PATCH v9] " Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-30 18:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-30 20:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-06 10:48 ` [RFC 1/2] testpmd: make f_quit flag volatile Andrew Rybchenko
2022-11-08 18:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-09 10:11 ` Ruifeng Wang
2022-11-09 10:37 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-01-30 20:09 ` [PATCH v10 0/2] testpmd: handle signals safely Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-30 20:09 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] cmdline: handle EOF in cmdline_poll Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-30 22:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-31 2:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-30 20:09 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] testpmd: cleanup cleanly from signal Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-31 9:30 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-30 22:13 ` [PATCH v10 0/2] testpmd: handle signals safely Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-03 19:14 ` [PATCH v11 0/3] Fix cmdline_poll and testpmd signal handling Stephen Hemminger
2023-02-03 19:14 ` [PATCH v11 1/3] cmdline: make rdline status not private Stephen Hemminger
2023-02-06 2:31 ` fengchengwen
2023-02-03 19:14 ` [PATCH v11 2/3] cmdline: handle EOF in cmdline_poll Stephen Hemminger
2023-02-03 19:14 ` [PATCH v11 3/3] testpmd: cleanup cleanly from signal Stephen Hemminger
2023-02-07 14:49 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-07 14:48 ` [PATCH v11 0/3] Fix cmdline_poll and testpmd signal handling Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-19 17:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-03-11 10:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-03-12 17:18 ` Tal Shnaiderman
2023-03-13 10:34 ` Ling, WeiX
2023-03-13 15:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-03-14 7:05 ` Ling, WeiX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39978e88-a231-9ef4-197e-ee1948d9c8ef@oktetlabs.ru \
--to=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jianbo.liu@linaro.org \
--cc=phil.yang@arm.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).