From: "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
To: "Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Kovacevic, Marko" <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
"Byrne, Stephen1" <stephen1.byrne@intel.com>,
"Tamboli, Amit S" <amit.tamboli@intel.com>,
"Padubidri, Sanjay A" <sanjay.padubidri@intel.com>,
"Patel, Amol" <amol.patel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:13:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F2A4341B4@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190402091836.35779-3-vipin.varghese@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Varghese, Vipin
>
> @@ -152,7 +157,7 @@ pdump_usage(const char *prgname)
> "[ring-size=<ring size>default:16384],"
> "[mbuf-size=<mbuf data size>default:2176],"
> "[total-num-mbufs=<number of
> mbufs>default:65535]'\n",
> - prgname);
> + prgname, CMD_LINE_OPT_MULTI,
IMO, simple short options can be used instead of long, as this option don't have any arguments to pass.
>
> +static int
> +dump_packets_core(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct pdump_tuples *pt = (struct pdump_tuples *) arg;
> +
> + printf(" core (%u); port %u device (%s) queue %u\n",
> + rte_lcore_id(), pt->port, pt->device_id, pt->queue);
Log message can be improved to be " packet_dump for port <num> running on core <id>"
> + fflush(stdout);
Why is fflush used here and in below other places?
>
> +The ``--multi`` command line option is optional argument. If passed,
> +capture will be running on unqiue cores for all ``--pdump`` options. If
Typo unique
Thanks,
Reshma
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-28 6:00 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 6:00 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 14:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 14:57 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 15:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 15:04 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 15:34 ` Wiles, Keith
2019-03-28 15:34 ` Wiles, Keith
2019-03-29 10:08 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-03-29 10:08 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-03-29 10:22 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-03-29 10:22 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-03-29 10:52 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-03-29 10:52 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-03-29 17:03 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-29 17:03 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-01 4:05 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-01 4:05 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-02 4:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] app/pdump: enhance to support unique cores Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 4:33 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 4:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] app/pdump: remove core restriction Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 4:33 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 4:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 4:33 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 7:05 ` David Marchand
2019-04-02 7:05 ` David Marchand
2019-04-02 8:06 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-02 8:06 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-02 9:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] app/pdump: enhance to support unique cores Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 9:18 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 9:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] app/pdump: remove core restriction Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 9:18 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 9:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 9:18 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 10:01 ` David Marchand
2019-04-02 10:01 ` David Marchand
2019-04-02 15:30 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-02 15:30 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-04 7:39 ` David Marchand
2019-04-04 7:39 ` David Marchand
2019-04-02 16:13 ` Pattan, Reshma [this message]
2019-04-02 16:13 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-03 3:53 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-03 3:53 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-05 17:10 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-05 17:10 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-08 3:03 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-08 3:03 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-04 8:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] app/pdump: enhance to support unique cores Vipin Varghese
2019-04-04 8:55 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-04 8:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] app/pdump: remove core restriction Vipin Varghese
2019-04-04 8:55 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-09 9:04 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-09 9:04 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-04 8:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture Vipin Varghese
2019-04-04 8:55 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-05 17:09 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-05 17:09 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-08 3:01 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-08 3:01 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-09 9:05 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-09 9:05 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-22 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] app/pdump: enhance to support unique cores Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-22 19:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F2A4341B4@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
--cc=amit.tamboli@intel.com \
--cc=amol.patel@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=sanjay.padubidri@intel.com \
--cc=stephen1.byrne@intel.com \
--cc=vipin.varghese@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).