DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
To: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PKTGEN] fixing weird termio issues that complicate debugging
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:59:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BB50D51-8D99-4CAD-A15F-708F9DDE6EFD@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <569F2A07.9000606@mhcomputing.net>

On 1/20/16, 12:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Matthew Hall" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org on behalf of mhall@mhcomputing.net> wrote:

Hi Matthew,

I have some comments below, but will address your full email later when I have a bit more time.

>Hello,
>
>Since the pktgen code is reindented I am finding time to read through it 
>and experiment and see if I can get it working.
>
>I have issues with the init process of pktgen. It is difficult to debug 
>it because the init code does a lot of very scary stuff to the terminal 
>control / TTY device at inconvenient times in an inconvenient order, and 
>in the process damages the debug output and damages the screen of your 
>GDB without doing weird things to run GDB on a different TTY.
>
>Of course I am willing to contribute patches and not just complain, but 
>first I need some help to follow what is going on.
>
>Here is the problematic call-flow with some explanation what went wrong 
>trying it on some community machines outside of its original environment:
>
>1) it calls printf("\n%s %s\n", wr_copyright_msg(), wr_powered_by()); 
>which dumps tons of weird boilerplate of licenses, copyrights, code 
>creator, etc.
>
>It is open source and everybody that matters already knows who coded it, 
>so is this stuff really that important? This gets in the way when you 
>are trying to work on it and I just have to comment it out.
>
>2) it calls wr_scrn_setw and tinkers with the windows size very early in 
>the init which can make your terminal weird
>
>3) it calls rte_eal_init which produces a lot of nice debug output, 
>which is fine
>
>4) it calls pktgen_init_screen, which calls wr_scrn_init, which calls 
>wr_scrn_erase which destroys the valuable debug output just created in 
>(c) which is a bad thing
>
>5) it calls wr_print_copyright and dumps more boilerplate I am not sure 
>is needed
>
>6) it logs some helpful messages about the port / descriptor settings 
>which is fine
>
>7) it calls the pktgen_config_ports function which can crash in ways you 
>need the destroyed debug output to fix.
>
>For example in my case that function crashes here:
>
>         if (pktgen.nb_ports == 0)
>                 pktgen_log_panic("*** Did not find any ports to use ***");

This problem is DPDK did not find any ports to use for Pktgen. Please check to make sure you have the right ports attached to gib_uio and they are usable by DPDK.
>
>8) Later it makes a logo and a splash screen (wr_log, wr_splash_screen). 
>Is this stuff really needed? This is a ton of output for just starting 
>up some test program.
>
>To fix this debug problem I propose some changes which I am happy to 
>help develop:
>
>1) decide what of this output we really need here and greatly simplify 
>how much gets printed out
>
>2) move wr_scrn_setw right before pktgen_init_screen and after 
>rte_eal_init to prevent damaging that output
>
>3) consider how wr_scrn_init is called in pktgen_init_screen, because it 
>calls wr_scrn_erase which damages output
>
>4) I think that pktgen_config_ports should be called before all this 
>weird screen init stuff, so that if it fails you can actually see what 
>happened there.
>
>One other random topic... on the long lines of code it looks like there 
>are some gigantic tab-indents pushing things off to the right still. One 
>example, maybe there are others or another setting which is needed to 
>fix all of these:

Please use tab stops of 4 instead of 8.
>
>                 info->seq_pkt = (pkt_seq_t *)rte_zmalloc_socket(buff, 
>(sizeof(pkt_seq_t) * NUM_TOTAL_PKTS),
> 
>                                          RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, 
>rte_socket_id());
>
>Thoughts?
>Matthew Hall
>


Regards,
Keith





  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-20 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-20  6:32 Matthew Hall
2016-01-20  8:53 ` Panu Matilainen
2016-01-20 15:59 ` Wiles, Keith [this message]
2016-01-20 16:26 ` Wiles, Keith
2016-01-20 16:45   ` Wiles, Keith
2016-01-21  3:53   ` Matthew Hall
2016-01-21  8:46   ` Panu Matilainen
2016-01-21 15:03     ` Wiles, Keith
2016-01-21 19:00       ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-01-21 20:03         ` Matthew Hall
2016-01-22  6:45       ` Panu Matilainen
2016-01-23  2:22         ` Wiles, Keith
2016-02-17 10:13           ` Panu Matilainen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BB50D51-8D99-4CAD-A15F-708F9DDE6EFD@intel.com \
    --to=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mhall@mhcomputing.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).